Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to assess the safety of microorganisms used in food and feed chains. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units. The QPS list was updated to verify the correctness of the names and the completeness of synonyms. Of the 47 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2024 and March 2025 (25 as feed additives, 7 as food enzymes or additives, 6 as novel foods, 8 as plant protection products and 1 as food contact materials), 41 were not evaluated. These latter included 11 filamentous fungi, 4 <i>Escherichia coli</i> and 1 <i>Streptomyces</i> spp. (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 25 already on the QPS list. Two of the other six notifications, <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> and <i>Ensifer adhaerens</i>, had been previously assessed. The remaining four were assessed for a possible QPS status. <i>Bacillus sonorensis</i> is recommended for the QPS list with the qualifications: 'absence of bacitracin production ability' and 'absence of toxigenic activity'. <i>Vibrio natriegens</i> is also recommended but for 'production purposes only'. <i>Corynebacterium stationis</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain and possible safety concerns in relation to human and animal health. <i>Papilotrema terrestris</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge. Furthermore, <i>Lactobacillus paragasseri</i> (formerly included in <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i>) is recommended for the QPS list. The QPS approach can also be followed if the qualifications for QPS are met due to the removal of a gene(s) of concern, by means of genetic modification. For QPS yeasts, used as active agents (viable cells), the qualification 'for production purposes only' was added for when they are used as production strains or as biomass (non-viable cells).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025

Lieve Herman, Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende et al.
15 citations
EFSA Journal
Agricultural safety and regulations
16.27
article

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025

Lieve Herman, Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende, Ingvar Sundh, Sandra Correia, Lapo Mughini‐Gras, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Sara Bover‐Cid, Lolke Sijtsma, Amparo Querol, Panagiotis Skandamis, Marianne Chemaly, Avelino Álvarez‐Ordóñez, Neil J Doyle, Laurent Guillier, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Wietske Dohmen, Alessandra De Cesare, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Elisabetta Suffredini, Luísa Peixe, Juan Evaristo Suárez, Jakob Ottoson, Fulvio Barizzone, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Justine Dastouet
article en
15 citations

Abstract

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to assess the safety of microorganisms used in food and feed chains. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units. The QPS list was updated to verify the correctness of the names and the completeness of synonyms. Of the 47 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2024 and March 2025 (25 as feed additives, 7 as food enzymes or additives, 6 as novel foods, 8 as plant protection products and 1 as food contact materials), 41 were not evaluated. These latter included 11 filamentous fungi, 4 <i>Escherichia coli</i> and 1 <i>Streptomyces</i> spp. (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 25 already on the QPS list. Two of the other six notifications, <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> and <i>Ensifer adhaerens</i>, had been previously assessed. The remaining four were assessed for a possible QPS status. <i>Bacillus sonorensis</i> is recommended for the QPS list with the qualifications: 'absence of bacitracin production ability' and 'absence of toxigenic activity'. <i>Vibrio natriegens</i> is also recommended but for 'production purposes only'. <i>Corynebacterium stationis</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain and possible safety concerns in relation to human and animal health. <i>Papilotrema terrestris</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge. Furthermore, <i>Lactobacillus paragasseri</i> (formerly included in <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i>) is recommended for the QPS list. The QPS approach can also be followed if the qualifications for QPS are met due to the removal of a gene(s) of concern, by means of genetic modification. For QPS yeasts, used as active agents (viable cells), the qualification 'for production purposes only' was added for when they are used as production strains or as biomass (non-viable cells).

EFSA JournalVol. 23(7)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agricultural safety and regulations
16.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.