The Role of Microarray in Modern Sequencing: Statistical Approach Matters in a Comparison Between Microarray and RNA-Seq

Gene expression analysis is crucial in understanding cellular processes, development, health, and disease. With RNA-seq outpacing microarray as the chosen platform for gene expression, is there space for array data in future profiling? This study involved 35 participants from the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Intervention protocol. RNA was isolated from whole blood samples and analyzed using both microarray and RNA-seq technologies. Data processing included quality control, normalization, and statistical analysis using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. Differential expression analysis and pathway analysis were conducted to compare the outputs of the two platforms. The study found a high correlation in gene expression profiles between microarray and RNA-seq, with a median Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76. RNA-seq identified 2395 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), while microarray identified 427 DEGs, with 223 DEGs shared between the two platforms. Pathway analysis revealed 205 perturbed pathways by RNA-seq and 47 by microarray, with 30 pathways shared. Both microarray and RNA-seq technologies provide highly concordant results when analyzed with consistent non-parametric statistical methods. The findings emphasize that both methods are reliable for gene expression analysis and can be used complementarily to enhance the robustness of biological insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioTech
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14030055
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Microarray in Modern Sequencing: Statistical Approach Matters in a Comparison Between Microarray and RNA-Seq

Maureen M. Goodenow, Guglielmo M. Venturi, Samiksha A. Borkar, Kai-Fen Chang et al.
2 citations
BioTech
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.61
article

The Role of Microarray in Modern Sequencing: Statistical Approach Matters in a Comparison Between Microarray and RNA-Seq

Maureen M. Goodenow, Guglielmo M. Venturi, Samiksha A. Borkar, Kai-Fen Chang, John W. Sleasman, Jerry Shen, Isaac Raplee, Upasana Nepal, Li Yin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gene expression analysis is crucial in understanding cellular processes, development, health, and disease. With RNA-seq outpacing microarray as the chosen platform for gene expression, is there space for array data in future profiling? This study involved 35 participants from the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Intervention protocol. RNA was isolated from whole blood samples and analyzed using both microarray and RNA-seq technologies. Data processing included quality control, normalization, and statistical analysis using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. Differential expression analysis and pathway analysis were conducted to compare the outputs of the two platforms. The study found a high correlation in gene expression profiles between microarray and RNA-seq, with a median Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76. RNA-seq identified 2395 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), while microarray identified 427 DEGs, with 223 DEGs shared between the two platforms. Pathway analysis revealed 205 perturbed pathways by RNA-seq and 47 by microarray, with 30 pathways shared. Both microarray and RNA-seq technologies provide highly concordant results when analyzed with consistent non-parametric statistical methods. The findings emphasize that both methods are reliable for gene expression analysis and can be used complementarily to enhance the robustness of biological insights.

BioTechVol. 14(3)
National Institutes of Health (US), Duke University (US), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, University of Southern California, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Miami, University of Pennsylvania, University of Florida, Tulane University, Johns Hopkins University, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, University of South Florida, Children's National Hospital, International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network, Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions, Children's Hospital of Michigan, National Institutes of Health, Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, U.S. Public Health Service, Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Research Resources, Office of AIDS Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.