Weeding the Biodiversity Patch—A Mesocosm Study of Predation by <i>Boeckella major</i> (Copepoda: Calanoida) on Billabong Zooplankton

ABSTRACT We carried out short‐term field experiments (duration 1–3 days) to study the impact of predation by natural densities of Boeckella major on zooplankton in Australian ephemeral billabongs (oxbow lakes). Predation reduced total zooplankton densities by 33.6%–91.9%. Rotifers, Daphnia lumholtzi , Bosmina meridionalis , Ilyocryptus spinifer and copepod nauplii were markedly reduced, but late‐stage calanoid copepodites, cyclopoid copepods and D. carinata were little affected. Clearance rates on total zooplankton were constant at about 100–110 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 above c. 25 zooplankton.L −1 but declined below this. Clearances on rotifers, small cladocerans, D. lumholtzi and nauplii (190–120 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 ) were higher than on cyclopoid copepods and calanoid CI–III (50–60 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 ). Clearance was zero on D. carinata and calanoid CIV–CV. Clearance rates were negatively related to prey length. Functional response curves for most prey were Types I or II, but may have been Type III for D. lumholtzi , small cladocerans and calanoid nauplii. Boeckella major showed switching behaviour; rotifers, calanoid nauplii and small cladocerans were positively selected when &gt; 10% of total zooplankton abundance. D. carinata and calanoid CIV–VI were avoided, but all other prey were selected in proportion to abundance. Selectivity was negatively related to prey size. D. lumholtzi was more vulnerable than expected from its size and was attacked mainly on the head and antennae. B. major mainly took prey &lt; 2 mm long, resulting in an increase in mean length of the zooplankton community. Zooplankton composition changed in favour of calanoid copepods and D. carinata , and species richness was reduced by up to 50%. The effects of B. major predation are predicted to decline below adult densities of 10.L −1 and to be minimal below 1.L −1 . The study suggests that B. major predation is a selective force structuring zooplankton communities of ephemeral billabongs. The effects occur only early in billabong development and are short‐lived, but a suite of other invertebrate predators may have similar effects at later stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Biology
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70064
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weeding the Biodiversity Patch—A Mesocosm Study of Predation by Boeckella major (Copepoda: Calanoida) on Billabong Zooplankton

Russell J. Shiel, John D. Green
1 links
Freshwater Biology
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
article

Weeding the Biodiversity Patch—A Mesocosm Study of Predation by Boeckella major (Copepoda: Calanoida) on Billabong Zooplankton

Russell J. Shiel, John D. Green
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We carried out short‐term field experiments (duration 1–3 days) to study the impact of predation by natural densities of Boeckella major on zooplankton in Australian ephemeral billabongs (oxbow lakes). Predation reduced total zooplankton densities by 33.6%–91.9%. Rotifers, Daphnia lumholtzi , Bosmina meridionalis , Ilyocryptus spinifer and copepod nauplii were markedly reduced, but late‐stage calanoid copepodites, cyclopoid copepods and D. carinata were little affected. Clearance rates on total zooplankton were constant at about 100–110 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 above c. 25 zooplankton.L −1 but declined below this. Clearances on rotifers, small cladocerans, D. lumholtzi and nauplii (190–120 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 ) were higher than on cyclopoid copepods and calanoid CI–III (50–60 mL.copepod −1 .day −1 ). Clearance was zero on D. carinata and calanoid CIV–CV. Clearance rates were negatively related to prey length. Functional response curves for most prey were Types I or II, but may have been Type III for D. lumholtzi , small cladocerans and calanoid nauplii. Boeckella major showed switching behaviour; rotifers, calanoid nauplii and small cladocerans were positively selected when &gt; 10% of total zooplankton abundance. D. carinata and calanoid CIV–VI were avoided, but all other prey were selected in proportion to abundance. Selectivity was negatively related to prey size. D. lumholtzi was more vulnerable than expected from its size and was attacked mainly on the head and antennae. B. major mainly took prey &lt; 2 mm long, resulting in an increase in mean length of the zooplankton community. Zooplankton composition changed in favour of calanoid copepods and D. carinata , and species richness was reduced by up to 50%. The effects of B. major predation are predicted to decline below adult densities of 10.L −1 and to be minimal below 1.L −1 . The study suggests that B. major predation is a selective force structuring zooplankton communities of ephemeral billabongs. The effects occur only early in billabong development and are short‐lived, but a suite of other invertebrate predators may have similar effects at later stages.

Freshwater BiologyVol. 70(7)
University of Waikato (NZ)
University of Waikato, Directorate for Biological Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.