Assessment of Bone Aging—A Comparison of Different Methods for Evaluating Bone Tissue

This study tackles the challenge of automatically estimating age from pelvis radiographs. Furthermore, we aim to develop a methodology for applying artificial intelligence to classify or regress medical imagery data. Our dataset comprises 684 pelvis X-ray images of patients, each accompanied by annotations and masks for various regions of interest (e.g., the femur shaft). Radiomic features, e.g., the co-occurrence matrix, were computed to characterize the image content. We assessed statistical analysis, machine learning, and deep learning methods for their effectiveness in this task. Correlation analysis indicated that using certain features in specific regions of interest is promising for accurate age estimation. Machine learning models demonstrated that when using uncorrelated features, the optimal mean absolute error (MAE) for age estimation is 5.20, whereas when employing convolutional networks on the texture feature maps yields the best result of 9.56. Automatically selecting radiomic features for machine learning models achieves a MAE of 7.99, whereas utilizing well-known convolutional architectures on the original image results in a system efficacy of 7.96. The use of artificial intelligence in medical data analysis produces comparable outcomes; however, when dealing with a large number of descriptors, selecting the most optimal ones through statistical analysis enables the identification of the best solution quickly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137526
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Bone Aging—A Comparison of Different Methods for Evaluating Bone Tissue

Karolina Nurzyǹska, Rafał Obuchowicz, Michał Strzelecki, Marcin Kociołek et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.72
article

Assessment of Bone Aging—A Comparison of Different Methods for Evaluating Bone Tissue

Karolina Nurzyǹska, Rafał Obuchowicz, Michał Strzelecki, Marcin Kociołek, Pawel M. Kaminski, Joanna Kwiecień, Adam Piórkowski, Elżbieta Pociask, Aleksander Gali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study tackles the challenge of automatically estimating age from pelvis radiographs. Furthermore, we aim to develop a methodology for applying artificial intelligence to classify or regress medical imagery data. Our dataset comprises 684 pelvis X-ray images of patients, each accompanied by annotations and masks for various regions of interest (e.g., the femur shaft). Radiomic features, e.g., the co-occurrence matrix, were computed to characterize the image content. We assessed statistical analysis, machine learning, and deep learning methods for their effectiveness in this task. Correlation analysis indicated that using certain features in specific regions of interest is promising for accurate age estimation. Machine learning models demonstrated that when using uncorrelated features, the optimal mean absolute error (MAE) for age estimation is 5.20, whereas when employing convolutional networks on the texture feature maps yields the best result of 9.56. Automatically selecting radiomic features for machine learning models achieves a MAE of 7.99, whereas utilizing well-known convolutional architectures on the original image results in a system efficacy of 7.96. The use of artificial intelligence in medical data analysis produces comparable outcomes; however, when dealing with a large number of descriptors, selecting the most optimal ones through statistical analysis enables the identification of the best solution quickly.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(13)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Jagiellonian University (PL), Lodz University of Technology (PL), Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Politechnika Lódzka
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.