Asterius of Amaseia Between Libanius and John Chrysostom on the Kalends of January
This article examines Asterius of Amaseia’s Homily 4 on the Kalends of January and compares it with the works of Libanius and John Chrysostom on the same subject. Preached in January 400, Asterius’ sermon takes a distinctive approach, focusing less on condemning pagan aspects and more on criticising immoral behaviour during the festival. The bishop emphasises the economic and non-inclusive nature of the celebration, directly refuting Libanius’ eulogy. Asterius portrays the Kalends as a source of social division and violence, in contrast to Libanius’ portrayal of shared joy. This article suggests that Asterius’ polemic reflects a social conflict rather than a pagan–Christian opposition, presenting the Kalends as a moral problem threatening society, particularly through the corruption of its leaders.
Authors
- Maria Veronese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4259-6653)
Institutions
- University of Padua (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Religions
- Published
- 2025-07-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070873
- Primary Topic
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00