Market Access and Compliance Innovation for Aibased Functional Safety Systems

The IEC Test Report Format (TRF) standardizes product testing and compliance, ensuring consistency across international standards and simplifying global certification. However, the increasing complexity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Functional Safety (FuSa) and Cybersecurity demands a more advanced and comprehensive approach. We introduce the Compliance Report Format (CRF)-an enhanced framework that builds upon IEC TRF by integrating AI assurance and FuSa compliance management. The CRF improves traceability, consistency, and efficiency in assurance case development and certification. To achieve this, the CRF incorporates key enhancements, including a profile-based approach, support for agile methodologies, explicit linkages to evidence, and integration with both the safety plan and assurance case. It also introduces structured arguments, synergy aspects, practical guidelines, and references to relevant research. With safety cases, a subset of assurance case, becoming increasingly central in UL 4600 “automotive autonomy” and the forthcoming IEC 61508 “generic Functional Safety (FuSa)” third edition, the CRF aligns with evolving regulatory landscapes. It also supports IOS/IEC TR 5469 “AI and FuSa”, strengthening the integration of AI and safety. By promoting a shift-left approach, the CRF facilitates early AI risk analysis, FuSa integration, and continuous validation, reducing late-stage compliance burdens. Additionally, by leveraging agile practices and the definition of ready concept, it minimizes compliance overhead while enhancing traceability of AI-related safety evidence. CRF's profile-based methodology tailors AI and FuSa requirements to domain-specific standards, ensuring flexibility and adaptability. Development engineers benefit from structured guidelines, references to industry standards, and links to scientific research, streamlining compliance efforts. By modernizing the compliance landscape, the CRF empowers engineers, auditors, and certification bodies to navigate AI-driven safety and cybersecurity challenges more effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00277
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Access and Compliance Innovation for Aibased Functional Safety Systems

Thor Myklebust
2 links
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

Market Access and Compliance Innovation for Aibased Functional Safety Systems

Thor Myklebust
article en

Abstract

The IEC Test Report Format (TRF) standardizes product testing and compliance, ensuring consistency across international standards and simplifying global certification. However, the increasing complexity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Functional Safety (FuSa) and Cybersecurity demands a more advanced and comprehensive approach. We introduce the Compliance Report Format (CRF)-an enhanced framework that builds upon IEC TRF by integrating AI assurance and FuSa compliance management. The CRF improves traceability, consistency, and efficiency in assurance case development and certification. To achieve this, the CRF incorporates key enhancements, including a profile-based approach, support for agile methodologies, explicit linkages to evidence, and integration with both the safety plan and assurance case. It also introduces structured arguments, synergy aspects, practical guidelines, and references to relevant research. With safety cases, a subset of assurance case, becoming increasingly central in UL 4600 “automotive autonomy” and the forthcoming IEC 61508 “generic Functional Safety (FuSa)” third edition, the CRF aligns with evolving regulatory landscapes. It also supports IOS/IEC TR 5469 “AI and FuSa”, strengthening the integration of AI and safety. By promoting a shift-left approach, the CRF facilitates early AI risk analysis, FuSa integration, and continuous validation, reducing late-stage compliance burdens. Additionally, by leveraging agile practices and the definition of ready concept, it minimizes compliance overhead while enhancing traceability of AI-related safety evidence. CRF's profile-based methodology tailors AI and FuSa requirements to domain-specific standards, ensuring flexibility and adaptability. Development engineers benefit from structured guidelines, references to industry standards, and links to scientific research, streamlining compliance efforts. By modernizing the compliance landscape, the CRF empowers engineers, auditors, and certification bodies to navigate AI-driven safety and cybersecurity challenges more effectively.

SINTEF (NO), SINTEF Digital
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Market Access and Compliance Innovation for Aibased Functional Safety Systems — Thor Myklebust · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS