A Proof-of-Concept Validation of Alignment in Decision-Making Attributes for Trustworthy AI

Aligning AI systems to the attributes of human decision-makers offers a promise of greater AI trustworthiness. The current research offers a proof-of-concept experiment investigating whether alignment to six different high-level attributes of decision-making in critical care medical triage and military field medicine is related to greater trust in more aligned target decision-makers. We find that greater alignment on these values is associated with reports of the target as trustworthy, with ratings that the target makes decisions in the same way as the participant, and with willingness to delegate to the target. Additionally, alignment predicted a forced-choice decision to delegate to one of two target decision makers. This research thus offers evidence that creating AI systems capable of alignment on these characteristics could offer an approach for trustworthy AI in medical triage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00204
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Proof-of-Concept Validation of Alignment in Decision-Making Attributes for Trustworthy AI

Cara Widmer, Amy Summerville, Ion Juvina, B. Locke Welborn et al.
1 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

A Proof-of-Concept Validation of Alignment in Decision-Making Attributes for Trustworthy AI

Cara Widmer, Amy Summerville, Ion Juvina, B. Locke Welborn, Louis Martí, Alice Leung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aligning AI systems to the attributes of human decision-makers offers a promise of greater AI trustworthiness. The current research offers a proof-of-concept experiment investigating whether alignment to six different high-level attributes of decision-making in critical care medical triage and military field medicine is related to greater trust in more aligned target decision-makers. We find that greater alignment on these values is associated with reports of the target as trustworthy, with ratings that the target makes decisions in the same way as the participant, and with willingness to delegate to the target. Additionally, alignment predicted a forced-choice decision to delegate to one of two target decision makers. This research thus offers evidence that creating AI systems capable of alignment on these characteristics could offer an approach for trustworthy AI in medical triage.

Wright State University (US), Kairos (United States) (US)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, U.S. Air Force
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.