What One Million Prompts Tells Us About AI Usage, Topics, and Preferences

With extensive research and significant progress made in AI in recent years, generative conversational AI products (such as ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) have been increasingly integrated into daily life, across a variety of tasks. While much research has focused on improving the capability of conversational AI, such as through developing novel model architectures and richer training corpora, comparatively less attention has been given to understanding how people use conversational AI. In this study, We analyzed a large, naturalistic dataset of 1 million human-AI prompt-response logs to explore and quantify common types of use cases. Focusing primarily on human prompts in a conversational dialogue system, we apply topic modeling techniques, and found that usage preferences were primarily for assisting users with coding and programming (15.54%), business management (10.33%), and visual design (8.76%). We also examined how usage dynamics of multi-turn conversation with a dialogue system-like conversational AI (GPT-series models). The results indicate that the majority of users' multi-turn conversations stay on one topic, and for the few multi-turn conversations identified, most of conversations focused on one topic instead of transitioning between multiple topics. Our research sheds light into usage dynamics for conversational AI, and also highlights the kinds of conversational topics that users use these AI for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00035
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What One Million Prompts Tells Us About AI Usage, Topics, and Preferences

Zhouqing Zhang, Thammathip Piumsomboon, Kongmeng Liew
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

What One Million Prompts Tells Us About AI Usage, Topics, and Preferences

Zhouqing Zhang, Thammathip Piumsomboon, Kongmeng Liew
article en

Abstract

With extensive research and significant progress made in AI in recent years, generative conversational AI products (such as ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) have been increasingly integrated into daily life, across a variety of tasks. While much research has focused on improving the capability of conversational AI, such as through developing novel model architectures and richer training corpora, comparatively less attention has been given to understanding how people use conversational AI. In this study, We analyzed a large, naturalistic dataset of 1 million human-AI prompt-response logs to explore and quantify common types of use cases. Focusing primarily on human prompts in a conversational dialogue system, we apply topic modeling techniques, and found that usage preferences were primarily for assisting users with coding and programming (15.54%), business management (10.33%), and visual design (8.76%). We also examined how usage dynamics of multi-turn conversation with a dialogue system-like conversational AI (GPT-series models). The results indicate that the majority of users' multi-turn conversations stay on one topic, and for the few multi-turn conversations identified, most of conversations focused on one topic instead of transitioning between multiple topics. Our research sheds light into usage dynamics for conversational AI, and also highlights the kinds of conversational topics that users use these AI for.

University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.