Creating Bayesian Ethical Alignment Models for Eliciting, Modeling, and Calibrating Ethical Human Decision-Making Values and Priorities

Ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently complex, context-dependent, and influenced by competing priorities. This paper presents a Bayesian ethical alignment modeling approach designed to capture, model, and calibrate human ethical values for AI decision-making. Unlike rule-based approaches, our method encodes organizational ethics within a probabilistic framework, allowing for dynamic updates and structured reasoning. We outline a structured methodology for elicitation, calibration, and validation, tested in high-stakes scenarios. We posit that this framework would enable AI to align with human ethical priorities while maintaining adaptability, scalability, and transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00207
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating Bayesian Ethical Alignment Models for Eliciting, Modeling, and Calibrating Ethical Human Decision-Making Values and Priorities

Ewart J. de Visser, Elan Freedy, Spencer Kohn, Gershon Weltman et al.
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Creating Bayesian Ethical Alignment Models for Eliciting, Modeling, and Calibrating Ethical Human Decision-Making Values and Priorities

Ewart J. de Visser, Elan Freedy, Spencer Kohn, Gershon Weltman, Marvin S. Cohen, David Barnes
article en

Abstract

Ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently complex, context-dependent, and influenced by competing priorities. This paper presents a Bayesian ethical alignment modeling approach designed to capture, model, and calibrate human ethical values for AI decision-making. Unlike rule-based approaches, our method encodes organizational ethics within a probabilistic framework, allowing for dynamic updates and structured reasoning. We outline a structured methodology for elicitation, calibration, and validation, tested in high-stakes scenarios. We posit that this framework would enable AI to align with human ethical priorities while maintaining adaptability, scalability, and transparency.

Perceptronics Solutions (United States) (US), United States Air Force Academy (US)
U.S. Military Academy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating Bayesian Ethical Alignment Models for Eliciting, Modeling, and Calibrating Ethical Human Decision-Making Values and Priorities — Ewart J. de Visser, Elan Freedy, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS