Creating Bayesian Ethical Alignment Models for Eliciting, Modeling, and Calibrating Ethical Human Decision-Making Values and Priorities
Ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently complex, context-dependent, and influenced by competing priorities. This paper presents a Bayesian ethical alignment modeling approach designed to capture, model, and calibrate human ethical values for AI decision-making. Unlike rule-based approaches, our method encodes organizational ethics within a probabilistic framework, allowing for dynamic updates and structured reasoning. We outline a structured methodology for elicitation, calibration, and validation, tested in high-stakes scenarios. We posit that this framework would enable AI to align with human ethical priorities while maintaining adaptability, scalability, and transparency.
Authors
- Ewart J. de Visser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-9081)
- Elan Freedy
- Spencer Kohn
- Gershon Weltman
- Marvin S. Cohen
- David Barnes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-877X)
Institutions
- Perceptronics Solutions (United States) (US)
- United States Air Force Academy (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-05-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00207
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- U.S. Military Academy