Coverage for Detecting Bias in Facial Recognition Datasets

Facial recognition algorithms are known to exhibit varying performance across different subgroups defined by factors like race and gender. These performance differences have been attributed to disparities in the representation of subgroups in the training data. Even when trained on large-scale datasets (i.e., “big data”), these disparities may persist. When the underlying training data is biased, the trained model is likely to be biased as well. Biased facial recognition models may be unreliable for underrepresented groups and lead to real world failures such as incorrect access control decisions in biometric systems or misidentification of individuals. Therefore, methods for assessing the breadth of intersectional contexts covered by datasets during the pre-processing phase before significant resources are invested in training models are essential. This work explores whether frequency coverage can detect data bias and whether coverage correlates with deep learning model performance via experiments on two facial recognition datasets with attributes for gender, race, and age. This work also explores the usefulness of visualizations to practitioners in making decisions about data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00047
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coverage for Detecting Bias in Facial Recognition Datasets

Erin Lanus, Laura Freeman, Sakshi Mhatre, Brian Lee
1 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.48
article

Coverage for Detecting Bias in Facial Recognition Datasets

Erin Lanus, Laura Freeman, Sakshi Mhatre, Brian Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Facial recognition algorithms are known to exhibit varying performance across different subgroups defined by factors like race and gender. These performance differences have been attributed to disparities in the representation of subgroups in the training data. Even when trained on large-scale datasets (i.e., “big data”), these disparities may persist. When the underlying training data is biased, the trained model is likely to be biased as well. Biased facial recognition models may be unreliable for underrepresented groups and lead to real world failures such as incorrect access control decisions in biometric systems or misidentification of individuals. Therefore, methods for assessing the breadth of intersectional contexts covered by datasets during the pre-processing phase before significant resources are invested in training models are essential. This work explores whether frequency coverage can detect data bias and whether coverage correlates with deep learning model performance via experiments on two facial recognition datasets with attributes for gender, race, and age. This work also explores the usefulness of visualizations to practitioners in making decisions about data.

Virginia Tech (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coverage for Detecting Bias in Facial Recognition Datasets — Erin Lanus, Laura Freeman, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS