A Generalisable Alignment System (GAS) for Humanartificial Intelligence (AI) Alignment

Current developments in the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) seek to create AI systems that behave in line with human decision-making preferences. Such alignment is thought to increase trust and delegation to AI in high-stakes decision-making situations. A central component of this question is what we align an AI to. Specifically, what factors within an individual predict the decisions that they will make. This is especially important when looking at decisions that do not have “right” answers and where even trusted experts may disagree. In this study we present a Generalizable Alignment System (GAS) based on an underlying framework that governs human choice. Using data from 234 members of the United States Armed Forces we present a framework of choice preference and then demonstrate how individual scores on this framework predict decision-making. The implications for AI design, alignment and trust are then discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cai64502.2025.00206
Primary Topic
Cognitive Computing and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Generalisable Alignment System (GAS) for Humanartificial Intelligence (AI) Alignment

Katelyn Smith, AnaCristina Bedoya, Elias Nader, Neil Shortland et al.
Cognitive Computing and Networks
article

A Generalisable Alignment System (GAS) for Humanartificial Intelligence (AI) Alignment

Katelyn Smith, AnaCristina Bedoya, Elias Nader, Neil Shortland, Laurence Alison, Joseph Cohn, Bob Bixler
article en

Abstract

Current developments in the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) seek to create AI systems that behave in line with human decision-making preferences. Such alignment is thought to increase trust and delegation to AI in high-stakes decision-making situations. A central component of this question is what we align an AI to. Specifically, what factors within an individual predict the decisions that they will make. This is especially important when looking at decisions that do not have “right” answers and where even trusted experts may disagree. In this study we present a Generalizable Alignment System (GAS) based on an underlying framework that governs human choice. Using data from 234 members of the United States Armed Forces we present a framework of choice preference and then demonstrate how individual scores on this framework predict decision-making. The implications for AI design, alignment and trust are then discussed.

University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Kent State University (US), SoarTech (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cognitive Computing and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.