New Cancer Drug Approvals: Less Than Half Of Important Clinical Trial Uncertainties Reported By The FDA To Clinicians, 2019–22

Uncertainties about the benefits and harms of new drugs are common at the time of drugs' approval. It is unclear to what extent the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communicates these uncertainties in the FDA-approved prescribing information (the drug label), which is the primary channel of communication between the FDA and physicians. Although physicians might not regularly consult the drug label for prescribing decisions, other information sources used by physicians either index or incorporate information from the label. We searched FDA review documents for uncertainties identified by FDA reviewers with new cancer drugs. We considered the subset of uncertainties highlighted in the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework as important to the FDA's approval decision. During the period 2019-22, the FDA approved fifty-two new cancer drugs. In review documents, FDA reviewers identified a total of 213 clinical trial uncertainties with new cancer drugs, 50 percent of which were considered to be important uncertainties to the FDA's approval decision. Labels for physicians reported information on 26 percent of all uncertainties and 48 percent of uncertainties that were important to the FDA's approval decision. Communicating uncertainties about the evidence of drugs in the label is essential for informing physicians about drugs' safe and effective use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01134
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Cancer Drug Approvals: Less Than Half Of Important Clinical Trial Uncertainties Reported By The FDA To Clinicians, 2019–22

Elias A. Mossialos, Avi Cherla, Steven Woloshin, Courtney Davis et al.
2 citations
Health Affairs
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
article

New Cancer Drug Approvals: Less Than Half Of Important Clinical Trial Uncertainties Reported By The FDA To Clinicians, 2019–22

Elias A. Mossialos, Avi Cherla, Steven Woloshin, Courtney Davis, Huseyin Naci, Olivier J. Wouters, Anita K. Wagner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Uncertainties about the benefits and harms of new drugs are common at the time of drugs' approval. It is unclear to what extent the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communicates these uncertainties in the FDA-approved prescribing information (the drug label), which is the primary channel of communication between the FDA and physicians. Although physicians might not regularly consult the drug label for prescribing decisions, other information sources used by physicians either index or incorporate information from the label. We searched FDA review documents for uncertainties identified by FDA reviewers with new cancer drugs. We considered the subset of uncertainties highlighted in the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework as important to the FDA's approval decision. During the period 2019-22, the FDA approved fifty-two new cancer drugs. In review documents, FDA reviewers identified a total of 213 clinical trial uncertainties with new cancer drugs, 50 percent of which were considered to be important uncertainties to the FDA's approval decision. Labels for physicians reported information on 26 percent of all uncertainties and 48 percent of uncertainties that were important to the FDA's approval decision. Communicating uncertainties about the evidence of drugs in the label is essential for informing physicians about drugs' safe and effective use.

Health AffairsVol. 44(7)
King's College London (GB), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US), Avalon Pharma (United States) (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.