Medigap Regulations Provide Protections For Beneficiaries, Especially After Health Shocks, But May Raise Premiums

Regulations for guaranteed issue and community rating for Medigap (supplemental) plans protect Medicare beneficiaries who want to leave the Medicare Advantage program from medical underwriting. These regulations, adopted in a handful of states, may be particularly valuable for beneficiaries with health shocks, defined as being newly diagnosed with a serious illness. Using a 20 percent random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from the period 2015-19, we found that disenrollment by those with health shocks was 2.75 percent in states with both regulations compared to 1.42 percent in states with neither regulation. The analogous estimates were 1.49 percent and 1.28 percent for those without health shocks. Whether these regulations are, on balance, beneficial depends on how one weighs the protection from underwriting against other consequences (such as higher Medigap premiums for low-risk beneficiaries).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01361
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medigap Regulations Provide Protections For Beneficiaries, Especially After Health Shocks, But May Raise Premiums

J. Michael McWilliams, Michael E. Chernew, Timothy Layton, Boris Vabson et al.
2 citations
Health Affairs
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.26
article

Medigap Regulations Provide Protections For Beneficiaries, Especially After Health Shocks, But May Raise Premiums

J. Michael McWilliams, Michael E. Chernew, Timothy Layton, Boris Vabson, Jingwei Sun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Regulations for guaranteed issue and community rating for Medigap (supplemental) plans protect Medicare beneficiaries who want to leave the Medicare Advantage program from medical underwriting. These regulations, adopted in a handful of states, may be particularly valuable for beneficiaries with health shocks, defined as being newly diagnosed with a serious illness. Using a 20 percent random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from the period 2015-19, we found that disenrollment by those with health shocks was 2.75 percent in states with both regulations compared to 1.42 percent in states with neither regulation. The analogous estimates were 1.49 percent and 1.28 percent for those without health shocks. Whether these regulations are, on balance, beneficial depends on how one weighs the protection from underwriting against other consequences (such as higher Medigap premiums for low-risk beneficiaries).

Health AffairsVol. 44(7)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), St Michaels Hospital (GB), BorgWarner (Brazil) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Medigap Regulations Provide Protections For Beneficiaries, Especially After Health Shocks, But May Raise Premiums — J. Michael McWilliams, Michael E. Chernew, et al. · Health Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS