Evaluating the canopy light environment, photosynthesis, and fruit comprehensive performance of greenhouse tomato under different mechanized planting layouts

Plant layout is critical for the formation of canopy microenvironment, and fruit yield and quality. Plant-layout designs that meet the requirements of photosynthetically efficient and mechanizable greenhouse cultivation are urgently needed. Here, we report our findings from a two-year trial using tomatoes grown in a plastic film greenhouse at high planting density (HPD, 4.55 plants · m -2 ) or low planting density (LPD, 3.13 plants · m -2 ). Each density comprised south-north (SN) and east-west (EW) row orientations, with three plant layouts (S1-S3 or E1-E3, S and E represent SN and EW row orientations, respectively) in each orientation: 90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm, and 90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm for HPD; and 120 cm + 40 cm + 40 cm, 120 cm + 60 cm + 36 cm, and 120 cm + 120 cm + 27 cm for LPD. Analysis included canopy accumulated light absorption (ACL), photosynthesis (ACP), and light uniformity (UC LP ) conducted using a three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model, along with individual fruit indices, and a comprehensive evaluation using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Plants grown under S2 and E2 exhibited respective dominance in both planting densities compared to those grown under any other treatment. Particularly, S2 showed higher ACL and single fruit weight, whereas E2 showed superior UC LP , comprehensive fruit quality, and fruit uniformity. Therefore, E2 was identified as an optimal plant configuration for both HPD and LPD based on overall fruit performance as evaluated using the TOPSIS method. Correlation analysis indicated that the light environment of the lower canopy layer under HPD and that of the middle canopy layer under LPD showed the strongest correlations with the main fruit indices. Overall, the optimal plant layout identified herein provides valuable decision support for horticultural production under mechanized planting conditions. The correlations between canopy light and fruit indices define quantitative breeding and management targets for optimizing fruit performance through adjustments in plant structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Horticultural Plant Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2025.03.010
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the canopy light environment, photosynthesis, and fruit comprehensive performance of greenhouse tomato under different mechanized planting layouts

Jianming Li, Xinru Chai, Fulai Liu, Jie Chang et al.
3 citations
Horticultural Plant Journal
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
5.25
article

Evaluating the canopy light environment, photosynthesis, and fruit comprehensive performance of greenhouse tomato under different mechanized planting layouts

Jianming Li, Xinru Chai, Fulai Liu, Jie Chang, Xiaolong Ma
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Plant layout is critical for the formation of canopy microenvironment, and fruit yield and quality. Plant-layout designs that meet the requirements of photosynthetically efficient and mechanizable greenhouse cultivation are urgently needed. Here, we report our findings from a two-year trial using tomatoes grown in a plastic film greenhouse at high planting density (HPD, 4.55 plants · m -2 ) or low planting density (LPD, 3.13 plants · m -2 ). Each density comprised south-north (SN) and east-west (EW) row orientations, with three plant layouts (S1-S3 or E1-E3, S and E represent SN and EW row orientations, respectively) in each orientation: 90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm, and 90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm for HPD; and 120 cm + 40 cm + 40 cm, 120 cm + 60 cm + 36 cm, and 120 cm + 120 cm + 27 cm for LPD. Analysis included canopy accumulated light absorption (ACL), photosynthesis (ACP), and light uniformity (UC LP ) conducted using a three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model, along with individual fruit indices, and a comprehensive evaluation using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Plants grown under S2 and E2 exhibited respective dominance in both planting densities compared to those grown under any other treatment. Particularly, S2 showed higher ACL and single fruit weight, whereas E2 showed superior UC LP , comprehensive fruit quality, and fruit uniformity. Therefore, E2 was identified as an optimal plant configuration for both HPD and LPD based on overall fruit performance as evaluated using the TOPSIS method. Correlation analysis indicated that the light environment of the lower canopy layer under HPD and that of the middle canopy layer under LPD showed the strongest correlations with the main fruit indices. Overall, the optimal plant layout identified herein provides valuable decision support for horticultural production under mechanized planting conditions. The correlations between canopy light and fruit indices define quantitative breeding and management targets for optimizing fruit performance through adjustments in plant structure.

Horticultural Plant Journal
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Agricultural Research System, Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.