RISKS OF THE DIGITAL WORLD: DIGITAL RISK-TAKING SCALE (DRTS) VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

This study aims to conduct validity and reliability of a measurement tool developed to determine university students’ levels of digital risk taking. 646 undergraduate students from 8 different universities voluntarily participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to reveal the factor structure of the measurement tool. Data were collected from two different sample groups sequentially. Item-total correlations and internal consistency values were considered to determine the reliability of the measurement tool. The analyses revealed that 12 items of the measurement tool clustered under two different factors. The item loadings ranged from .49 to .76. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit for the measurement tool. The internal consistency coefficient of the measurement tool was calculated as .77 for the first sample and .76 for the second sample. Correlation analyses conducted to determine the criterion validity of the measurement tool revealed significant relationships between the scores obtained from the measurement tool and variables such as digital dependency, digital citizenship, cognitive flexibility, and emotion regulation. Based on the conducted analyses, it was determined that the measurement tool is a valid and reliable instrument that can be employed to assess the university students’ levels of digital risk taking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1523508
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RISKS OF THE DIGITAL WORLD: DIGITAL RISK-TAKING SCALE (DRTS) VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu, Betül Aydın
1 links
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

RISKS OF THE DIGITAL WORLD: DIGITAL RISK-TAKING SCALE (DRTS) VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu, Betül Aydın
article en

Abstract

This study aims to conduct validity and reliability of a measurement tool developed to determine university students’ levels of digital risk taking. 646 undergraduate students from 8 different universities voluntarily participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to reveal the factor structure of the measurement tool. Data were collected from two different sample groups sequentially. Item-total correlations and internal consistency values were considered to determine the reliability of the measurement tool. The analyses revealed that 12 items of the measurement tool clustered under two different factors. The item loadings ranged from .49 to .76. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit for the measurement tool. The internal consistency coefficient of the measurement tool was calculated as .77 for the first sample and .76 for the second sample. Correlation analyses conducted to determine the criterion validity of the measurement tool revealed significant relationships between the scores obtained from the measurement tool and variables such as digital dependency, digital citizenship, cognitive flexibility, and emotion regulation. Based on the conducted analyses, it was determined that the measurement tool is a valid and reliable instrument that can be employed to assess the university students’ levels of digital risk taking.

Turkish Online Journal of Distance EducationVol. 26(3)
Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.