Experience in Using a Sociological Survey to Evaluate Comfort of the LivingEnvironment for the Population

Introduction: The uniqueness of the problem of establishing the comfort of an urban environment is related to its multifactorial nature owing to the fact that physicochemical factors having a potential combined effect on the human body are involved in creating a comfortable urban environment in addition to social ones. Comfort assessment questionnaires traditionally include social questions on satisfaction with the living environment. Objective: To evaluate comprehensive perception of the comfort of living by urban population. Materials and methods: The online population survey was conducted from July to September 2024 at https://rusarctic.com. The answers of 254 respondents from 38 settlements of 15 constituent entities of the Russian Federation were then analyzed in Microsoft Excel and visualized using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3. Results: We established that 43.3 % and 51.2 % of the respondents considered climate and environmental conditions comfortable for living, respectively. Less than 9.0 % of them lived near industrial enterprises and major sources of traffic noise. The reasons for living in the current settlement included it being the place of birth, followed by housing, work, relatives and friends. In the opinion of 81.9 % of the respondents, air and water pollution, high levels of exposure to road traffic noise, and lack of public services and social amenities reduced the overall comfort level. The measures suggested to enhance comfort included improvement of the quality of environmental factors and landscaping. Discussion: The respondents noted poor climate conditions, lack of landscaping, drinking water pollution, and traffic noise as the reasons for reduced comfort. Those who found it difficult to appraise the comfort of living reported high-quality modern conveniences in populated areas, low noise levels, clean ambient air and drinking water. Conclusion: The questionnaire-based survey allowed us to make a comprehensive evaluation of the comfort of living for the population. A more detailed analysis of satisfaction with living conditions that takes into account the combined effect of environmental factors will be feasible after modifying the questionnaire and surveying a larger number of respondents to improve representativeness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2025-33-5-29-36
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience in Using a Sociological Survey to Evaluate Comfort of the LivingEnvironment for the Population

Yuliya A. Novikova, Olga S. Alenteva, Igor O. Myasnikov, Olga I. Kopytenkova
ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT
Noise Effects and Management
article

Experience in Using a Sociological Survey to Evaluate Comfort of the LivingEnvironment for the Population

Yuliya A. Novikova, Olga S. Alenteva, Igor O. Myasnikov, Olga I. Kopytenkova
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The uniqueness of the problem of establishing the comfort of an urban environment is related to its multifactorial nature owing to the fact that physicochemical factors having a potential combined effect on the human body are involved in creating a comfortable urban environment in addition to social ones. Comfort assessment questionnaires traditionally include social questions on satisfaction with the living environment. Objective: To evaluate comprehensive perception of the comfort of living by urban population. Materials and methods: The online population survey was conducted from July to September 2024 at https://rusarctic.com. The answers of 254 respondents from 38 settlements of 15 constituent entities of the Russian Federation were then analyzed in Microsoft Excel and visualized using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3. Results: We established that 43.3 % and 51.2 % of the respondents considered climate and environmental conditions comfortable for living, respectively. Less than 9.0 % of them lived near industrial enterprises and major sources of traffic noise. The reasons for living in the current settlement included it being the place of birth, followed by housing, work, relatives and friends. In the opinion of 81.9 % of the respondents, air and water pollution, high levels of exposure to road traffic noise, and lack of public services and social amenities reduced the overall comfort level. The measures suggested to enhance comfort included improvement of the quality of environmental factors and landscaping. Discussion: The respondents noted poor climate conditions, lack of landscaping, drinking water pollution, and traffic noise as the reasons for reduced comfort. Those who found it difficult to appraise the comfort of living reported high-quality modern conveniences in populated areas, low noise levels, clean ambient air and drinking water. Conclusion: The questionnaire-based survey allowed us to make a comprehensive evaluation of the comfort of living for the population. A more detailed analysis of satisfaction with living conditions that takes into account the combined effect of environmental factors will be feasible after modifying the questionnaire and surveying a larger number of respondents to improve representativeness.

ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.