Commentary: The Italian Customs Reform: Lights and Shadows

On 4 October 2024, the reform of the customs regulations complementary to the European Union Code came into force in Italy. Legislative Decree No. 141/2024 introduced significant amendments to the previous regulatory provisions, which had been in place for over fifty years. The amendments pertained to various aspects of customs regulation, including border duties, the contract of mandate for the purposes of customs representation, and other matters. The procedures for online and ex-post verification, and above all, on criminal and administrative penalties, were modified with the declared aim of adapting them to the principles of effectiveness, proportionality and dissuasiveness laid down in Article 42 of the EU Customs Code and repeatedly affirmed by the EU Court of Justice. A review of the regulatory text nevertheless creates some uncertainty, both with respect to the Union discipline that the Italian legislature has also stated it wishes to implement, and with respect to the rulings of the Luxembourg Court, whose principles do not seem to have been correctly implemented.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2025087
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary: The Italian Customs Reform: Lights and Shadows

Alessandro Fruscione
Global Trade and Customs Journal
European and International Law Studies
article

Commentary: The Italian Customs Reform: Lights and Shadows

Alessandro Fruscione
article en

Abstract

On 4 October 2024, the reform of the customs regulations complementary to the European Union Code came into force in Italy. Legislative Decree No. 141/2024 introduced significant amendments to the previous regulatory provisions, which had been in place for over fifty years. The amendments pertained to various aspects of customs regulation, including border duties, the contract of mandate for the purposes of customs representation, and other matters. The procedures for online and ex-post verification, and above all, on criminal and administrative penalties, were modified with the declared aim of adapting them to the principles of effectiveness, proportionality and dissuasiveness laid down in Article 42 of the EU Customs Code and repeatedly affirmed by the EU Court of Justice. A review of the regulatory text nevertheless creates some uncertainty, both with respect to the Union discipline that the Italian legislature has also stated it wishes to implement, and with respect to the rulings of the Luxembourg Court, whose principles do not seem to have been correctly implemented.

Global Trade and Customs JournalVol. 20(Issue 7/8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Commentary: The Italian Customs Reform: Lights and Shadows — Alessandro Fruscione · Global Trade and Customs Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS