Towards a Quantitative Estimate of Anthropogenic Subsoil Compaction in European Croplands Based on National Soil Surveys

ABSTRACT Subsoil compaction can lead to lower yields and reduced ecosystem functioning due to limited root growth of crops and can affect the cycling of nutrients and water within the soil. Subsoil compaction is often assessed using soil packing density, which accounts for textural differences in bulk density, and a reference threshold. Due to the high costs of sampling bulk density, subsoil compaction is rarely assessed at regional or national scales. While some soils are naturally compact, human activities, for example agriculture, are known to further increase subsoil compactness. The assessment of the anthropogenic component of the subsoil compactness is challenged by the lack of reference soil (i.e., unaffected by anthropogenic activities) that is otherwise comparable in terms of pedogenic and climatic parameters. In this study, a data‐driven reciprocal modelling approach was used to model a reference subsoil bulk density for annual croplands based on observations from permanent grasslands, as grasslands are assumed to be free of anthropogenic subsoil compaction. The data originated from soil monitoring networks in five European countries (Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, France, Germany and Ireland). Depending on the country, the subsoil surpassed the compaction threshold of 1.71 g cm −3 packing density for 14%–52% of sites. The highest proportion of compacted sites was found in Flanders, while Denmark had the lowest proportion. Similarly, the highest estimated anthropogenic subsoil compaction was found in Flanders (mean 0.05 g cm −3 ) while the lowest was found in France (mean 0.00 g cm −3 ). Overall, the highest estimated anthropogenic subsoil compaction was found in loamy soils and soils with the lowest organic C content, such as eastern Germany and eastern Denmark. Based on our results, between 0% (France) and 47% (Flanders) of the annual cropland sites currently surpass the packing density threshold for compacted soil due to anthropogenic activities rather than due to pedogenic drivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Soil Science
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70150
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Quantitative Estimate of Anthropogenic Subsoil Compaction in European Croplands Based on National Soil Surveys

Patrick Tuohy, Giulia Bondi, Laura Sofie Harbo, Julien Wengler et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Soil Science
Soil Management and Crop Yield
3.56
article

Towards a Quantitative Estimate of Anthropogenic Subsoil Compaction in European Croplands Based on National Soil Surveys

Patrick Tuohy, Giulia Bondi, Laura Sofie Harbo, Julien Wengler, Amélie Beucher, Florian Schneider, Mathieu Lamandé, Tommy D’Hose, Marine Lacoste, Owen Fenton, Line Boulonne
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Subsoil compaction can lead to lower yields and reduced ecosystem functioning due to limited root growth of crops and can affect the cycling of nutrients and water within the soil. Subsoil compaction is often assessed using soil packing density, which accounts for textural differences in bulk density, and a reference threshold. Due to the high costs of sampling bulk density, subsoil compaction is rarely assessed at regional or national scales. While some soils are naturally compact, human activities, for example agriculture, are known to further increase subsoil compactness. The assessment of the anthropogenic component of the subsoil compactness is challenged by the lack of reference soil (i.e., unaffected by anthropogenic activities) that is otherwise comparable in terms of pedogenic and climatic parameters. In this study, a data‐driven reciprocal modelling approach was used to model a reference subsoil bulk density for annual croplands based on observations from permanent grasslands, as grasslands are assumed to be free of anthropogenic subsoil compaction. The data originated from soil monitoring networks in five European countries (Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, France, Germany and Ireland). Depending on the country, the subsoil surpassed the compaction threshold of 1.71 g cm −3 packing density for 14%–52% of sites. The highest proportion of compacted sites was found in Flanders, while Denmark had the lowest proportion. Similarly, the highest estimated anthropogenic subsoil compaction was found in Flanders (mean 0.05 g cm −3 ) while the lowest was found in France (mean 0.00 g cm −3 ). Overall, the highest estimated anthropogenic subsoil compaction was found in loamy soils and soils with the lowest organic C content, such as eastern Germany and eastern Denmark. Based on our results, between 0% (France) and 47% (Flanders) of the annual cropland sites currently surpass the packing density threshold for compacted soil due to anthropogenic activities rather than due to pedogenic drivers.

European Journal of Soil ScienceVol. 76(4)
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE), Aarhus University (DK), Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
European Commission, Ministry of Environment, Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet, Thünen-Institut, Grønt Udviklings- og Demonstrations Program, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
3.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.