Exploring the intellectual and social dynamics of food sector research in the context of climate change: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract This paper explores the cross-fertilisation of literature between the food sector and climate change fields by performing a bibliometric analysis. In total, 3714 papers were retrieved from the Scopus database. Bibliographic coupling identified sixteen literature streams and their compositions. Co-authorship network analysis explored scholarly social communities. Comparing clustering results from both analyses assessed whether the intellectual closeness of communities was also social. Findings reveal that authors who mostly contributed to the two fields often participated cross-sectionally, touching upon various literature streams. Even when authors mainly dealt with one topic, they did so within heterogeneous research groups. Implications include directions for future research agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal on food system dynamics
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18696945-bja00012
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the intellectual and social dynamics of food sector research in the context of climate change: a bibliometric analysis

Lana Repar, Alberto Baccini, Joe Bogue, Vittoria Iannuzzi
International journal on food system dynamics
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Exploring the intellectual and social dynamics of food sector research in the context of climate change: a bibliometric analysis

Lana Repar, Alberto Baccini, Joe Bogue, Vittoria Iannuzzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the cross-fertilisation of literature between the food sector and climate change fields by performing a bibliometric analysis. In total, 3714 papers were retrieved from the Scopus database. Bibliographic coupling identified sixteen literature streams and their compositions. Co-authorship network analysis explored scholarly social communities. Comparing clustering results from both analyses assessed whether the intellectual closeness of communities was also social. Findings reveal that authors who mostly contributed to the two fields often participated cross-sectionally, touching upon various literature streams. Even when authors mainly dealt with one topic, they did so within heterogeneous research groups. Implications include directions for future research agenda.

International journal on food system dynamics
University of Siena (IT), University College Cork (IE), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.