Listening to Disputants: Changing the Frame, Framing the Change

Listening to Disputants: Changing the Frame, Framing the Change Drawing on empirical evidence from interviews with experienced users of dispute resolution processes for EU cross-border commercial disputes, this article provides new insights into the reasons why parties do not use mediation. At a time when attention has returned to examining why the EU Mediation Directive has had a limited impact on the promotion of mediation in the EU, drawing on these empirical insights, this article argues for a fundamental shift in the EU’s approach to promoting mediation. Rather than an emphasis on what mediation enables disputants to avoid (namely, litigation), as has been the emphasis to date in the EU’s promotion of mediation, this article calls for a promotion of mediation which recognises what is being asked of disputants when they mediate and which thereby has the potential to be of increased resonance with potential users of mediation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tmd/138638782025028003003
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listening to Disputants: Changing the Frame, Framing the Change

Alexis Howard
Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Listening to Disputants: Changing the Frame, Framing the Change

Alexis Howard
article en

Abstract

Listening to Disputants: Changing the Frame, Framing the Change Drawing on empirical evidence from interviews with experienced users of dispute resolution processes for EU cross-border commercial disputes, this article provides new insights into the reasons why parties do not use mediation. At a time when attention has returned to examining why the EU Mediation Directive has had a limited impact on the promotion of mediation in the EU, drawing on these empirical insights, this article argues for a fundamental shift in the EU’s approach to promoting mediation. Rather than an emphasis on what mediation enables disputants to avoid (namely, litigation), as has been the emphasis to date in the EU’s promotion of mediation, this article calls for a promotion of mediation which recognises what is being asked of disputants when they mediate and which thereby has the potential to be of increased resonance with potential users of mediation.

Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagementVol. 28(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.