Media, modality, and motivation in literary-aesthetic experience: exploring auditory and visual reception of literature

• Listening to literary texts is not perceived as either inferior or superior. Rather, a diversity of perceptual perspectives predominates. • Contrary to many theoretical assumptions, audiobook listening is sometimes rated higher than reading, with advantages such as better text comprehension, enhanced imaginary visualization, and greater immersion – but not for all audiobook listeners. • Listening to literature primarily serves the purpose of relaxation, which has implications for the selection of texts, as well as the situations and practices of literary reception. • Listening to audiobooks compared to reading creates an effect of social presence, which plays a significant role especially during periods of loneliness or illness. Audiobooks have a rich history, evolving from Edison's invention of the phonograph to today's digital audiobooks. Initially considered auxiliary to printed books, audiobooks now enjoy concurrent release and widespread consumption, evident in market growth and increased user engagement. Persistent debates surround the classification of audiobook perception as reading, proponents advocating equivalence while critics contend that they are distinct modes of reception and aesthetic experience. Based on a praxeological approach and a theoretical framework encompassing text, medium, listeners, situations & practices and their resulting effects, this focus group study ( n = 34) revealed nuanced perceptions and self-descriptions of regular audiobook listeners, indicating clear distinctions between reading and listening. Despite divergent opinions, the participants demonstrate awareness of their motivations, concrete text selection, specific practices, and contextual factors that influence their choice of reception modality. This research highlights the implications of shifting from print reading to digital listening and the disparities and similarities between the auditory and visual reception of literary texts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poetics
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media, modality, and motivation in literary-aesthetic experience: exploring auditory and visual reception of literature

Lukas Kosch, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe, Hajo G. Boomgaarden
1 citations
Poetics
Media Influence and Health
15.18
article

Media, modality, and motivation in literary-aesthetic experience: exploring auditory and visual reception of literature

Lukas Kosch, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe, Hajo G. Boomgaarden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Listening to literary texts is not perceived as either inferior or superior. Rather, a diversity of perceptual perspectives predominates. • Contrary to many theoretical assumptions, audiobook listening is sometimes rated higher than reading, with advantages such as better text comprehension, enhanced imaginary visualization, and greater immersion – but not for all audiobook listeners. • Listening to literature primarily serves the purpose of relaxation, which has implications for the selection of texts, as well as the situations and practices of literary reception. • Listening to audiobooks compared to reading creates an effect of social presence, which plays a significant role especially during periods of loneliness or illness. Audiobooks have a rich history, evolving from Edison's invention of the phonograph to today's digital audiobooks. Initially considered auxiliary to printed books, audiobooks now enjoy concurrent release and widespread consumption, evident in market growth and increased user engagement. Persistent debates surround the classification of audiobook perception as reading, proponents advocating equivalence while critics contend that they are distinct modes of reception and aesthetic experience. Based on a praxeological approach and a theoretical framework encompassing text, medium, listeners, situations & practices and their resulting effects, this focus group study ( n = 34) revealed nuanced perceptions and self-descriptions of regular audiobook listeners, indicating clear distinctions between reading and listening. Despite divergent opinions, the participants demonstrate awareness of their motivations, concrete text selection, specific practices, and contextual factors that influence their choice of reception modality. This research highlights the implications of shifting from print reading to digital listening and the disparities and similarities between the auditory and visual reception of literary texts.

PoeticsVol. 111
University of Vienna (AT), Hochschule Campus Wien (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Health
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.