Solidarity and International Taxation: Integrating an Ubuntu Approach in UN Tax Policy

The article examines the potential of using the Ubuntu principle that is rooted in several African legal traditions (but particularly in South Africa) to legitimize a more proactive United Nations (UN) role in international taxation. Global taxation systems have historically been predominantly shaped by European principles that prioritize values such as the ability to pay, economic substance, and benefit principles. These principles underpin statutory frameworks, anti-evasion measures, and judicial interpretations. In contrast, the African philosophy of Ubuntu emphasizing community solidarity and collective well-being offers a transformative perspective. The study explores how the Ubuntu-based approach, particularly as implemented in South Africa, could influence the development of international tax policies that are more equitable and inclusive. The analysis aligns with the UN General Assembly’s position on global tax reform as articulated in November 2023. The article argues that adopting an Ubuntu framework could address systemic imbalances inherent in traditional European contractual models of taxation and provide a stronger moral and social foundation for tax systems. It ultimately seeks to harmonize taxation with Ubuntu’s principles advocating for international tax polies that prioritize social justice and solidarity underpinned by judicial reasoning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2025052
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solidarity and International Taxation: Integrating an Ubuntu Approach in UN Tax Policy

Marco Greggi, Mthokozisi Fortune Khuzwayo, Lizelle Ramaccio Calvino, Anne Soldat
Intertax
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Solidarity and International Taxation: Integrating an Ubuntu Approach in UN Tax Policy

Marco Greggi, Mthokozisi Fortune Khuzwayo, Lizelle Ramaccio Calvino, Anne Soldat
article en

Abstract

The article examines the potential of using the Ubuntu principle that is rooted in several African legal traditions (but particularly in South Africa) to legitimize a more proactive United Nations (UN) role in international taxation. Global taxation systems have historically been predominantly shaped by European principles that prioritize values such as the ability to pay, economic substance, and benefit principles. These principles underpin statutory frameworks, anti-evasion measures, and judicial interpretations. In contrast, the African philosophy of Ubuntu emphasizing community solidarity and collective well-being offers a transformative perspective. The study explores how the Ubuntu-based approach, particularly as implemented in South Africa, could influence the development of international tax policies that are more equitable and inclusive. The analysis aligns with the UN General Assembly’s position on global tax reform as articulated in November 2023. The article argues that adopting an Ubuntu framework could address systemic imbalances inherent in traditional European contractual models of taxation and provide a stronger moral and social foundation for tax systems. It ultimately seeks to harmonize taxation with Ubuntu’s principles advocating for international tax polies that prioritize social justice and solidarity underpinned by judicial reasoning.

IntertaxVol. 53(Issue 8/9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.