Do European Firms Pull Back from China? Evidence of Divestment from the Auto Sector

In the context of intensifying economic nationalism and the geopoliticization of trade and investment policies, a large number of initiatives across the European Union have been introduced to ‘de-risk’ from China by incentivizing companies to pull back and bring production back to Europe. While such policies and their efforts to counter China’s dominance in supply chains have garnered much attention, little beyond anecdotal evidence is known about whether – and to what extent – European firms are responding to these calls. This paper sheds light on this dynamic and analyses the ownership structure of European automotive firms in China over a fifteen-year period (2008–2023) using original firm-level data. It finds that the largest European firms have largely maintained steady ownership levels in Chinese enterprises, with minimal evidence of significant divestment. These findings underscore the stability of European firms’ investment strategies during this period that covers the Great Financial Crisis and the aftermath of Covid-19, shedding light on the interplay between geopolitics and firms’ strategic decisionmaking in an era of increasing unilateralism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Trade
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2025032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do European Firms Pull Back from China? Evidence of Divestment from the Auto Sector

Aydin B. Yildirim
1 citations
Journal of World Trade
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Do European Firms Pull Back from China? Evidence of Divestment from the Auto Sector

Aydin B. Yildirim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the context of intensifying economic nationalism and the geopoliticization of trade and investment policies, a large number of initiatives across the European Union have been introduced to ‘de-risk’ from China by incentivizing companies to pull back and bring production back to Europe. While such policies and their efforts to counter China’s dominance in supply chains have garnered much attention, little beyond anecdotal evidence is known about whether – and to what extent – European firms are responding to these calls. This paper sheds light on this dynamic and analyses the ownership structure of European automotive firms in China over a fifteen-year period (2008–2023) using original firm-level data. It finds that the largest European firms have largely maintained steady ownership levels in Chinese enterprises, with minimal evidence of significant divestment. These findings underscore the stability of European firms’ investment strategies during this period that covers the Great Financial Crisis and the aftermath of Covid-19, shedding light on the interplay between geopolitics and firms’ strategic decisionmaking in an era of increasing unilateralism.

Journal of World TradeVol. 59(Issue 4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.