Assessing soil erosion vulnerability using a novel capacity–condition framework (CCF): A case study from New South Wales, Australia

Soil water erosion poses a critical threat to long-term soil sustainability. However, challenges remain in capturing how both natural and human-induced erosion processes interact over space and time to influence soil degradation. Current assessment methods often overlook how erosion simultaneously weakens the soil’s inherent resistance (capacity) and degrades its current state (condition)-key drivers of long-term vulnerability and two core dimensions of soil security. To address this, we present a Capacity-Condition(CCF) framework, which quantifies erosion vulnerability using the erosion risk capability metric, which captures the gap between a soil’s inherent resistance to erosion (capacity) and its erosion-altered state (condition). The framework employs the pedogeonon concept, identifying unique landscape units where the same soil-forming factors operate over time. Within each pedogeonon, two soil states are compared: genosoil (conditions influenced by natural erosion) and phenosoil (present state shaped by both natural and human-accelerated erosion). Capacity is assessed using genosoil indicators (clay ratio and topsoil thickness), and condition is evaluated using the phenosoil/genosoil ratio for the same indicators. Utility functions standardize these indicators on a 0-1 scale, enabling their aggregation into composite scores. When applied to New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the framework identified regions most vulnerable to erosion. Coastal areas and the upper northwest, characterized by intensive dry cropping and grazing on modified pastures, exhibited the highest risk values, indicating a lower capability to withstand future erosion. Conversely, regions with mixed land use-including grazing on native vegetation, intensive horticulture, and irrigated cropping-showed moderate risk, demonstrating the framework’s utility for targeted, spatially explicit soil conservation and land management planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.07.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing soil erosion vulnerability using a novel capacity–condition framework (CCF): A case study from New South Wales, Australia

Alex B. McBratney, Budiman Minasny, Damien J. Field, Anilkumar Hunakunti
1 citations
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.19
article

Assessing soil erosion vulnerability using a novel capacity–condition framework (CCF): A case study from New South Wales, Australia

Alex B. McBratney, Budiman Minasny, Damien J. Field, Anilkumar Hunakunti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil water erosion poses a critical threat to long-term soil sustainability. However, challenges remain in capturing how both natural and human-induced erosion processes interact over space and time to influence soil degradation. Current assessment methods often overlook how erosion simultaneously weakens the soil’s inherent resistance (capacity) and degrades its current state (condition)-key drivers of long-term vulnerability and two core dimensions of soil security. To address this, we present a Capacity-Condition(CCF) framework, which quantifies erosion vulnerability using the erosion risk capability metric, which captures the gap between a soil’s inherent resistance to erosion (capacity) and its erosion-altered state (condition). The framework employs the pedogeonon concept, identifying unique landscape units where the same soil-forming factors operate over time. Within each pedogeonon, two soil states are compared: genosoil (conditions influenced by natural erosion) and phenosoil (present state shaped by both natural and human-accelerated erosion). Capacity is assessed using genosoil indicators (clay ratio and topsoil thickness), and condition is evaluated using the phenosoil/genosoil ratio for the same indicators. Utility functions standardize these indicators on a 0-1 scale, enabling their aggregation into composite scores. When applied to New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the framework identified regions most vulnerable to erosion. Coastal areas and the upper northwest, characterized by intensive dry cropping and grazing on modified pastures, exhibited the highest risk values, indicating a lower capability to withstand future erosion. Conversely, regions with mixed land use-including grazing on native vegetation, intensive horticulture, and irrigated cropping-showed moderate risk, demonstrating the framework’s utility for targeted, spatially explicit soil conservation and land management planning.

International Soil and Water Conservation ResearchVol. 13(4)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Australian Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.