Fundus photograph interpretation of common retinal disorders by artificial intelligence chatbots

While previous studies have examined the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to interpret optical coherence tomography scans, their performance in interpreting fundus photographs of retinal disorders without text-based context remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the ability of three widely used AI chatbots to accurately diagnose common retinal disorders from fundus photographs in the absence of text-based context. Cross-section study. We prompted ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and Copilot, with a set of 50 fundus photographs from the American Society of Retina Specialists Retina Image Bank® in March 2024, comprising of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, epiretinal membrane, retinal vein occlusion, and retinal detachment. Chatbots were re-prompted four times using the same images throughout June 2024. The primary endpoint was the proportion of each chatbot’s correct diagnoses. No text-based guidance was provided. In March 2024, Gemini provided a correct diagnosis for 17 (34%, 95% CI: 21%-49%) fundus images, ChatGPT-4 for 16 (32%, 95% CI: 20%-47%), and Copilot for 9 (18%, 95% CI: 9%-31%) (p>0.05). In June 2024, Gemini provided a correct diagnosis for 122 (61%, 95% CI: 53%-67%) images, ChatGPT-4 for 101 (51%, 95% CI: 43%-58%), and Copilot for 57 (29%, 95% CI: 22%-35%). No AI chatbot use in this study was sufficiently accurate for the diagnosis of common retinal disorders from fundus photographs. AI chatbots should not currently be utilized in any clinical setting involving fundus images, given concerns for accuracy and bioethical considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJO International
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100154
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundus photograph interpretation of common retinal disorders by artificial intelligence chatbots

Marko M. Popovic, Rajeev H. Muni, Andrew Mihalache, Susan S. Huang et al.
AJO International
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Fundus photograph interpretation of common retinal disorders by artificial intelligence chatbots

Marko M. Popovic, Rajeev H. Muni, Andrew Mihalache, Susan S. Huang, Ryan S. Huang, Peng Yan, David T. Wong
article en

Abstract

While previous studies have examined the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to interpret optical coherence tomography scans, their performance in interpreting fundus photographs of retinal disorders without text-based context remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the ability of three widely used AI chatbots to accurately diagnose common retinal disorders from fundus photographs in the absence of text-based context. Cross-section study. We prompted ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and Copilot, with a set of 50 fundus photographs from the American Society of Retina Specialists Retina Image Bank® in March 2024, comprising of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, epiretinal membrane, retinal vein occlusion, and retinal detachment. Chatbots were re-prompted four times using the same images throughout June 2024. The primary endpoint was the proportion of each chatbot’s correct diagnoses. No text-based guidance was provided. In March 2024, Gemini provided a correct diagnosis for 17 (34%, 95% CI: 21%-49%) fundus images, ChatGPT-4 for 16 (32%, 95% CI: 20%-47%), and Copilot for 9 (18%, 95% CI: 9%-31%) (p>0.05). In June 2024, Gemini provided a correct diagnosis for 122 (61%, 95% CI: 53%-67%) images, ChatGPT-4 for 101 (51%, 95% CI: 43%-58%), and Copilot for 57 (29%, 95% CI: 22%-35%). No AI chatbot use in this study was sufficiently accurate for the diagnosis of common retinal disorders from fundus photographs. AI chatbots should not currently be utilized in any clinical setting involving fundus images, given concerns for accuracy and bioethical considerations.

AJO InternationalVol. 2(3)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Toronto (CA), The Retina Center (US), Unity Health Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.