SEXUAL HARASSMENT, WORKPLACE AUTHORITY AND THE PARADOX OF POWER

Objective: This study investigates the paradox of power in workplace sexual harassment, focusing on how authority and power dynamics contribute to harassment incidents and perpetuate toxic organizational environments. Method: Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with employees across various industries to explore the relationship between authority, power imbalances, and harassment occurrences. Results: The findings reveal that power imbalances significantly facilitate harassment by enabling individuals in positions of authority to exploit their power without accountability. Organizational culture, inadequate reporting mechanisms, and fear of retaliation are identified as critical factors that sustain this paradox. Novelty: This study uniquely highlights the contradiction between the intended role of authority—to ensure structure and productivity—and its misuse as a tool for harassment. By emphasizing the need for ethical leadership and accountability, the research provides new insights into dismantling power dynamics that perpetuate workplace harassment. Recommendations include comprehensive organizational reforms, transparent reporting systems, and leadership training to promote ethical authority use, fostering safer and more equitable work environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Science.
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61796/ijss.v2i2.38
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SEXUAL HARASSMENT, WORKPLACE AUTHORITY AND THE PARADOX OF POWER

Cathy Abraham
Journal of Social Science.
Labor Movements and Unions
article

SEXUAL HARASSMENT, WORKPLACE AUTHORITY AND THE PARADOX OF POWER

Cathy Abraham
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the paradox of power in workplace sexual harassment, focusing on how authority and power dynamics contribute to harassment incidents and perpetuate toxic organizational environments. Method: Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with employees across various industries to explore the relationship between authority, power imbalances, and harassment occurrences. Results: The findings reveal that power imbalances significantly facilitate harassment by enabling individuals in positions of authority to exploit their power without accountability. Organizational culture, inadequate reporting mechanisms, and fear of retaliation are identified as critical factors that sustain this paradox. Novelty: This study uniquely highlights the contradiction between the intended role of authority—to ensure structure and productivity—and its misuse as a tool for harassment. By emphasizing the need for ethical leadership and accountability, the research provides new insights into dismantling power dynamics that perpetuate workplace harassment. Recommendations include comprehensive organizational reforms, transparent reporting systems, and leadership training to promote ethical authority use, fostering safer and more equitable work environments.

Journal of Social Science.Vol. 2(2)
Rivers State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.