Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions

Purpose Doctors are expected to be lifelong learners and engage in continuous professional development throughout their careers. Learning to be a self-directed learner as early as possible is therefore likely to lay the foundation for future learning and development. For this reason, self-directed learning (SDL) has recently been incorporated into the internal medicine curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh at King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate faculty perceptions of the effectiveness of the SDL activities. Methods The evaluation framework for this study was underpinned by Stufflebeam's context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation model. Seven faculty members took part in semi-structured interviews that explored their understandings of SDL objectives (context), their perceptions of the methods and resources used (input), the implementation of SDL activities (process), and whether they met their intended educational goals (product). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the thematic analysis method. Results The following four themes emerged from the data and were mapped against the elements of the CIPP model: faculty perception of SDL (context), content and resources (input), facilitation and scheduling (process), and student engagement and assessment (product). Conclusions The faculty had different opinions about the objectives and content of SDL sessions; however, they agreed that they align with internal medicine objectives and clinical content. The faculty perceived SDL activities as a reading task for students to complete prior to group discussion. The data revealed the need for faculty training to conduct such sessions. Challenges in the learning environment were reported, including issues in library access and the scheduling of academic activities. The participants reported poor student engagement to be a particular challenge and made suggestions on how this could be addressed. In addition, they emphasized the need for assessment for these sessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.87353
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions

Michal Tombs, Ammar A Balkheyour
1 citations
Cureus
Online and Blended Learning
8.93
article

Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions

Michal Tombs, Ammar A Balkheyour
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Doctors are expected to be lifelong learners and engage in continuous professional development throughout their careers. Learning to be a self-directed learner as early as possible is therefore likely to lay the foundation for future learning and development. For this reason, self-directed learning (SDL) has recently been incorporated into the internal medicine curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh at King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate faculty perceptions of the effectiveness of the SDL activities. Methods The evaluation framework for this study was underpinned by Stufflebeam's context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation model. Seven faculty members took part in semi-structured interviews that explored their understandings of SDL objectives (context), their perceptions of the methods and resources used (input), the implementation of SDL activities (process), and whether they met their intended educational goals (product). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the thematic analysis method. Results The following four themes emerged from the data and were mapped against the elements of the CIPP model: faculty perception of SDL (context), content and resources (input), facilitation and scheduling (process), and student engagement and assessment (product). Conclusions The faculty had different opinions about the objectives and content of SDL sessions; however, they agreed that they align with internal medicine objectives and clinical content. The faculty perceived SDL activities as a reading task for students to complete prior to group discussion. The data revealed the need for faculty training to conduct such sessions. Challenges in the learning environment were reported, including issues in library access and the scheduling of academic activities. The participants reported poor student engagement to be a particular challenge and made suggestions on how this could be addressed. In addition, they emphasized the need for assessment for these sessions.

CureusVol. 17(7)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online and Blended Learning
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.