Geochronological, geochemical and isotopic constraints on the genesis of Cu mineralization in the giant Zhuxi W–Cu deposit, South China

• Cu in Zhuxi is derived mainly from the Neoproterozoic metavolcanoclastic rocks. • Cu and giant W mineralization at Zhuxi do not belong to the same magmatic system • The crust–mantle reaction process is responsible for the W–Cu coexistence at Zhuxi. • Cu could coexist with W during the lithospheric compression–extension conversion. The reported coexisting Cu and W mineralization of economic significance in single ore deposit worldwide is rare. However, both Cu and W mineralization have been discovered in the giant Zhuxi W-Cu deposit in South China. To address the genetic relations between the shallow Cu and deep W mineralization in this giant ore system, here we report U-Pb dating, trace element and Hf isotope data of zircon from the Cu-related granodiorite porphyry, U-Pb dating and trace element data for hydrothermal titanite and S isotopic data for sulfide related to Cu mineralization. The U-Pb ages of zircons from two granodiorite porphyry samples are 155.7 ± 0.8 Ma and 152.5 ± 0.7 Ma, respectively, which are consistent with the U-Pb age of the hydrothermal titanites of 154.5 ± 5.0 Ma, suggesting that the shallow Cu mineralization formed in the late Jurassic and was simultaneously associated with the deep giant W mineralization at Zhuxi. Trace element composition of titanites favor a high f H 2 O and relatively low f O 2 environment for Cu formation. Sulfides exhibit δ 34 S values ranging from –0.9 ‰ to 3.5 ‰, indicating a magmatic origin. Zircons from the granodiorite porphyry present ε Hf ( t ) values of − 9.9 to 1.3, suggesting that the Cu ore-related granodiorite magmas were derived mainly from the partial melting of Cu-enriched metavolcanoclastic rocks with minor mantle sources. Trace element composition of zircons indicate a magma mixing process with high-temperature melts > 750 °C that are relatively rich in Y, Th and rare earth elements but with lower Hf concentrations, being added to relatively low-temperature ∼ 700 °C crustal-derived granodiorite magmas. Combining the above data and previously determined zircon Lu–Hf isotopes, we propose that the Cu and W in Zhuxi may have been derived mainly from the partial melting of Cu-enriched metavolcanoclastic rocks and W-enriched metasedimentary sequences of the Neoproterozoic juvenile crust, respectively. The intrusion of the Cu-related granodiorite porphyry should have been triggered by the upwelling of heated mafic magmas from the asthenospheric mantle during the Late Jurassic lithospheric compressional–extensional conversion stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106767
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geochronological, geochemical and isotopic constraints on the genesis of Cu mineralization in the giant Zhuxi W–Cu deposit, South China

Yongpeng Ouyang, Weiqi Jin, Runling Zeng, Xiaolong He et al.
1 citations
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
article

Geochronological, geochemical and isotopic constraints on the genesis of Cu mineralization in the giant Zhuxi W–Cu deposit, South China

Yongpeng Ouyang, Weiqi Jin, Runling Zeng, Xiaolong He, Qi Chen, Xiaofei Pan, Zengqian Hou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Cu in Zhuxi is derived mainly from the Neoproterozoic metavolcanoclastic rocks. • Cu and giant W mineralization at Zhuxi do not belong to the same magmatic system • The crust–mantle reaction process is responsible for the W–Cu coexistence at Zhuxi. • Cu could coexist with W during the lithospheric compression–extension conversion. The reported coexisting Cu and W mineralization of economic significance in single ore deposit worldwide is rare. However, both Cu and W mineralization have been discovered in the giant Zhuxi W-Cu deposit in South China. To address the genetic relations between the shallow Cu and deep W mineralization in this giant ore system, here we report U-Pb dating, trace element and Hf isotope data of zircon from the Cu-related granodiorite porphyry, U-Pb dating and trace element data for hydrothermal titanite and S isotopic data for sulfide related to Cu mineralization. The U-Pb ages of zircons from two granodiorite porphyry samples are 155.7 ± 0.8 Ma and 152.5 ± 0.7 Ma, respectively, which are consistent with the U-Pb age of the hydrothermal titanites of 154.5 ± 5.0 Ma, suggesting that the shallow Cu mineralization formed in the late Jurassic and was simultaneously associated with the deep giant W mineralization at Zhuxi. Trace element composition of titanites favor a high f H 2 O and relatively low f O 2 environment for Cu formation. Sulfides exhibit δ 34 S values ranging from –0.9 ‰ to 3.5 ‰, indicating a magmatic origin. Zircons from the granodiorite porphyry present ε Hf ( t ) values of − 9.9 to 1.3, suggesting that the Cu ore-related granodiorite magmas were derived mainly from the partial melting of Cu-enriched metavolcanoclastic rocks with minor mantle sources. Trace element composition of zircons indicate a magma mixing process with high-temperature melts > 750 °C that are relatively rich in Y, Th and rare earth elements but with lower Hf concentrations, being added to relatively low-temperature ∼ 700 °C crustal-derived granodiorite magmas. Combining the above data and previously determined zircon Lu–Hf isotopes, we propose that the Cu and W in Zhuxi may have been derived mainly from the partial melting of Cu-enriched metavolcanoclastic rocks and W-enriched metasedimentary sequences of the Neoproterozoic juvenile crust, respectively. The intrusion of the Cu-related granodiorite porphyry should have been triggered by the upwelling of heated mafic magmas from the asthenospheric mantle during the Late Jurassic lithospheric compressional–extensional conversion stage.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 184
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), China Minmetals (China) (CN), Xiangtan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.