One after another: vicarious trauma associated with archival record coding in sexual assault research

Sexual violence researchers have prolonged exposure to the pain and suffering of others, which can cause vicarious trauma (VT). To date, discussion of VT in sexual violence research has focused on qualitative interviews with sexual assault survivors and how those interactions affect researchers’ well-being. In this article, we explore how VT can develop archival record review studies. We conducted an autoethnographic analysis of four empirical case studies to identify key factors that shape researchers’ VT experiences during archival coding: the volume of records reviewed, potential for recoding, limited human interaction, and exposure to multiple layers of trauma and oppression. Based on our experiences, we propose strategies to mitigate and prevent the VT experienced during archival coding research and discuss how strategies used to manage VT in qualitative interview projects could apply to record review research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2025d000000088
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One after another: vicarious trauma associated with archival record coding in sexual assault research

Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Rebecca Campbell
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

One after another: vicarious trauma associated with archival record coding in sexual assault research

Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Rebecca Campbell
article en

Abstract

Sexual violence researchers have prolonged exposure to the pain and suffering of others, which can cause vicarious trauma (VT). To date, discussion of VT in sexual violence research has focused on qualitative interviews with sexual assault survivors and how those interactions affect researchers’ well-being. In this article, we explore how VT can develop archival record review studies. We conducted an autoethnographic analysis of four empirical case studies to identify key factors that shape researchers’ VT experiences during archival coding: the volume of records reviewed, potential for recoding, limited human interaction, and exposure to multiple layers of trauma and oppression. Based on our experiences, we propose strategies to mitigate and prevent the VT experienced during archival coding research and discuss how strategies used to manage VT in qualitative interview projects could apply to record review research.

Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Wichita State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One after another: vicarious trauma associated with archival record coding in sexual assault research — Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Rebecca Campbell · Journal of Gender-Based Violence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS