Ghosts in the closet: anti-gender rhetoric and conspiracy theories in Georgia’s European Union accession

‘Anti-gender’ has become a rallying cry for many populist radical-right parties and movements across Europe and the world. Georgia’s ruling party, ‘Georgian Dream’, is no exception to this. However, ‘Georgian Dream’ has gone further by undermining the country’s European Union (EU) accession with anti-gender conspiracy theories. This article does not ask whether this is a reasonable or legitimate strategy. Instead, it puts the focus on the asymmetry between internal EU decision making and the expectations expressed vis-à-vis EU accession candidates. It finds that misgivings experienced by some EU member states in the Council of the EU are now directly feeding into the rhetoric of EU-hostile third-country governments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Discourse
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20437897y2025d000000074
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ghosts in the closet: anti-gender rhetoric and conspiracy theories in Georgia’s European Union accession

Thomas Kruessmann
1 citations
Global Discourse
European and International Law Studies
8.52
article

Ghosts in the closet: anti-gender rhetoric and conspiracy theories in Georgia’s European Union accession

Thomas Kruessmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

‘Anti-gender’ has become a rallying cry for many populist radical-right parties and movements across Europe and the world. Georgia’s ruling party, ‘Georgian Dream’, is no exception to this. However, ‘Georgian Dream’ has gone further by undermining the country’s European Union (EU) accession with anti-gender conspiracy theories. This article does not ask whether this is a reasonable or legitimate strategy. Instead, it puts the focus on the asymmetry between internal EU decision making and the expectations expressed vis-à-vis EU accession candidates. It finds that misgivings experienced by some EU member states in the Council of the EU are now directly feeding into the rhetoric of EU-hostile third-country governments.

Global Discourse
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European and International Law Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.