The civil liability of physicians and bioethics

In December 2024, the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice ruled that a physician working in a public institution may be sued personally for civil liability for negligent or wrongful acts, without excluding the possibility of also taking administrative action against the State. The case, derived from a malpractice suit against a public servant of the IMSS, raised the distinction between the subjective liability of the physician -which requires proving fault- and the objective liability of the State -which is based on the irregular performance of the service. This decision has bioethical and legal implications, as it allows the affected party to choose the way to claim damages, setting a relevant precedent in medical-health liability in Mexico.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mexican Bioethics Review ICSA
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29057/mbr.v7i13.15201
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The civil liability of physicians and bioethics

Alejandro Pacheco Gómez, Ulises Pacheco-Gómez
Mexican Bioethics Review ICSA
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

The civil liability of physicians and bioethics

Alejandro Pacheco Gómez, Ulises Pacheco-Gómez
article en

Abstract

In December 2024, the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice ruled that a physician working in a public institution may be sued personally for civil liability for negligent or wrongful acts, without excluding the possibility of also taking administrative action against the State. The case, derived from a malpractice suit against a public servant of the IMSS, raised the distinction between the subjective liability of the physician -which requires proving fault- and the objective liability of the State -which is based on the irregular performance of the service. This decision has bioethical and legal implications, as it allows the affected party to choose the way to claim damages, setting a relevant precedent in medical-health liability in Mexico.

Mexican Bioethics Review ICSAVol. 7(13)
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.