Bias correction for quantile regression estimators

We study the bias of classical quantile regression and instrumental variable quantile regression estimators. While being asymptotically first-order unbiased, these estimators can have non-negligible second-order biases. We derive a higher-order stochastic expansion of these estimators using empirical process theory. Based on this expansion, we derive an explicit formula for the second-order bias and propose a feasible bias correction procedure that uses finite-difference estimators of the bias components. The proposed bias correction method performs well in simulations. We provide an empirical illustration using Engel’s classical data on household food expenditure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Econometrics
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2025.106053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias correction for quantile regression estimators

Bulat Gafarov, Kaspar Wüthrich, Grigory Franguridi
1 citations
Journal of Econometrics
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

Bias correction for quantile regression estimators

Bulat Gafarov, Kaspar Wüthrich, Grigory Franguridi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study the bias of classical quantile regression and instrumental variable quantile regression estimators. While being asymptotically first-order unbiased, these estimators can have non-negligible second-order biases. We derive a higher-order stochastic expansion of these estimators using empirical process theory. Based on this expansion, we derive an explicit formula for the second-order bias and propose a feasible bias correction procedure that uses finite-difference estimators of the bias components. The proposed bias correction method performs well in simulations. We provide an empirical illustration using Engel’s classical data on household food expenditure.

Journal of EconometricsVol. 251
University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US), Centre for Economic and Social Studies (IN), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.