Codifying Neurorights: A Legal Imperative for the Neural Age

The rapid developments in the field of neurotechnology and neuroscience have caused profound challenges to individual rights, particularly regarding mental integrity and privacy. This paper discusses neurorights as the required legal and ethical framework to protect cognitive autonomy in the digital era. The study is based on preliminary research on neuroethics and human rights law and highlights the inadequacy of the current legal frameworks to respond to the intrusive potential of neurotechnologies that can bypass consent requirements and can access and modify neural data. The study argues that mental integrity and privacy, which are the fundamental aspects of human dignity, are more threatened than ever, requiring an immediate regulatory and normative response. The research recommends that in order to ensure the benefits of neurotechnology, without undermining human dignity, the states and institutions need to codify neurorights as part of emerging human rights regime in the neural age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.03.0330
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Codifying Neurorights: A Legal Imperative for the Neural Age

Hafsa Naz, Muhammad Sohail Asghar
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Codifying Neurorights: A Legal Imperative for the Neural Age

Hafsa Naz, Muhammad Sohail Asghar
article en

Abstract

The rapid developments in the field of neurotechnology and neuroscience have caused profound challenges to individual rights, particularly regarding mental integrity and privacy. This paper discusses neurorights as the required legal and ethical framework to protect cognitive autonomy in the digital era. The study is based on preliminary research on neuroethics and human rights law and highlights the inadequacy of the current legal frameworks to respond to the intrusive potential of neurotechnologies that can bypass consent requirements and can access and modify neural data. The study argues that mental integrity and privacy, which are the fundamental aspects of human dignity, are more threatened than ever, requiring an immediate regulatory and normative response. The research recommends that in order to ensure the benefits of neurotechnology, without undermining human dignity, the states and institutions need to codify neurorights as part of emerging human rights regime in the neural age.

ACADEMIA International Journal for Social SciencesVol. 4(3)
University of Okara (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Codifying Neurorights: A Legal Imperative for the Neural Age — Hafsa Naz, Muhammad Sohail Asghar · ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS