Conservation tillage enhances both organic and inorganic carbon in dryland: Insights from a 20-year field experiment and meta-analysis

Conservation tillage is widely recognized as a promising practice for sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC). However, its impact on soil inorganic carbon (SIC) remains less understood and has seldom been quantified. This study aimed to examine the effects of conservation tillage on soil carbon pools, focusing on SIC, by combining a 20-year field experiment in an arid-calcareous cropland of China with a meta-analysis of 76 pairwise data from 7 studies. The field experiment confirms that conservation tillage significantly increases carbon stock, with reduced tillage (RT) increasing SOC (25.09 %, 0–40 cm) and no-tillage (NT) increasing SIC (10.67 %, 0–20 cm). SOC and SIC exhibit a complementary relationship, whereby an increase in SOC effectively compensates for reduced SIC within RT. Notably, the proliferation of calcifying bacteria (e.g., Bacillus ) and reduced urease activity suggest that microbial-induced carbonate precipitation, a process known to be facilitated by these bacteria, may contribute significantly to SIC formation under NT. Agronomic practices, as well as soil abiotic and biotic factors, collectively influence SIC. The relative importance of these factors varies with soil depth: biotic variables effects weaken with depth, while abiotic variables increase. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals that the response of SIC to conservation tillage varies with climatic, edaphic, and agronomic factors. Arid regions benefit the most from NT in enhancing SIC stock (3.27 %). These findings provide valuable insights into how conservation tillage influences soil carbon, particularly SIC, and enhance our understanding of carbon dynamics in arid systems. ● Conservation tillage significantly improves soil properties in arid alkaline cropland. ● Reduced tillage develops soil organic carbon, while no-tillage (NT) increases soil inorganic carbon (SIC). ● NT is associated with an increase in ureolytic microbial abundance, potentially promoting carbonate precipitation. ● SIC is influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors. ● NT is a pivotal strategy for enhancing SIC sequestration in dryland agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109845
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation tillage enhances both organic and inorganic carbon in dryland: Insights from a 20-year field experiment and meta-analysis

Zhiming Qi, Xueping Wu, Vilim Filipović, Weiting Ding et al.
5 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.93
article

Conservation tillage enhances both organic and inorganic carbon in dryland: Insights from a 20-year field experiment and meta-analysis

Zhiming Qi, Xueping Wu, Vilim Filipović, Weiting Ding, Hailong He, Shengping Li, Liangjie Sun
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Conservation tillage is widely recognized as a promising practice for sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC). However, its impact on soil inorganic carbon (SIC) remains less understood and has seldom been quantified. This study aimed to examine the effects of conservation tillage on soil carbon pools, focusing on SIC, by combining a 20-year field experiment in an arid-calcareous cropland of China with a meta-analysis of 76 pairwise data from 7 studies. The field experiment confirms that conservation tillage significantly increases carbon stock, with reduced tillage (RT) increasing SOC (25.09 %, 0–40 cm) and no-tillage (NT) increasing SIC (10.67 %, 0–20 cm). SOC and SIC exhibit a complementary relationship, whereby an increase in SOC effectively compensates for reduced SIC within RT. Notably, the proliferation of calcifying bacteria (e.g., Bacillus ) and reduced urease activity suggest that microbial-induced carbonate precipitation, a process known to be facilitated by these bacteria, may contribute significantly to SIC formation under NT. Agronomic practices, as well as soil abiotic and biotic factors, collectively influence SIC. The relative importance of these factors varies with soil depth: biotic variables effects weaken with depth, while abiotic variables increase. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals that the response of SIC to conservation tillage varies with climatic, edaphic, and agronomic factors. Arid regions benefit the most from NT in enhancing SIC stock (3.27 %). These findings provide valuable insights into how conservation tillage influences soil carbon, particularly SIC, and enhance our understanding of carbon dynamics in arid systems. ● Conservation tillage significantly improves soil properties in arid alkaline cropland. ● Reduced tillage develops soil organic carbon, while no-tillage (NT) increases soil inorganic carbon (SIC). ● NT is associated with an increase in ureolytic microbial abundance, potentially promoting carbonate precipitation. ● SIC is influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors. ● NT is a pivotal strategy for enhancing SIC sequestration in dryland agriculture.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 393
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Zagreb (HR), Ministry of Agriculture (BW), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Ministry of Agriculture (TN), University of Manitoba (CA), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Qingdao Agricultural University, High-end Foreign Experts Recruitment Plan of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.