Finite element analysis of maxillary arch distalization using skeletal anchorage at three different application regions

This study aimed to evaluate total maxillary arch distalization using three different skeletal anchorage systems-Mini Screw-Assisted Keleş Slider (MKS), infrazygomatic crest (IZC) screw, and maxillary tuberosity (MT) screw-through finite element analysis (FEA). A 3D cranio-maxillary model including dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone was constructed. For the MKS and IZC groups, forces were applied at three vertical heights (0 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm apically), while the MT group involved three directional applications: buccal, palatal, and combined bucco-palatal. This design yielded nine distinct simulation scenarios. Tooth movements were assessed along the x (transverse), y (sagittal), and z (vertical) axes, and Von Mises stress distributions were analyzed in surrounding structures. In the MKS group, the first scenario showed the greatest molar crown displacement, while the third had the highest root-level movement. The ninth MT scenario yielded the most palatal crown displacement of incisors, while the sixth IZC scenario showed the greatest root movement. Apical force applications (MKS and IZC at 3-6 mm) allowed controlled displacement suited for Class II Division 2 malocclusions. In contrast, archwire-level and MT scenarios produced patterns favorable for Class II Division 1 cases. Anchorage type and force direction significantly affected distalization outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10035-9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite element analysis of maxillary arch distalization using skeletal anchorage at three different application regions

Fırat Oğuz, Samet Özden
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
6.70
article

Finite element analysis of maxillary arch distalization using skeletal anchorage at three different application regions

Fırat Oğuz, Samet Özden
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate total maxillary arch distalization using three different skeletal anchorage systems-Mini Screw-Assisted Keleş Slider (MKS), infrazygomatic crest (IZC) screw, and maxillary tuberosity (MT) screw-through finite element analysis (FEA). A 3D cranio-maxillary model including dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone was constructed. For the MKS and IZC groups, forces were applied at three vertical heights (0 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm apically), while the MT group involved three directional applications: buccal, palatal, and combined bucco-palatal. This design yielded nine distinct simulation scenarios. Tooth movements were assessed along the x (transverse), y (sagittal), and z (vertical) axes, and Von Mises stress distributions were analyzed in surrounding structures. In the MKS group, the first scenario showed the greatest molar crown displacement, while the third had the highest root-level movement. The ninth MT scenario yielded the most palatal crown displacement of incisors, while the sixth IZC scenario showed the greatest root movement. Apical force applications (MKS and IZC at 3-6 mm) allowed controlled displacement suited for Class II Division 2 malocclusions. In contrast, archwire-level and MT scenarios produced patterns favorable for Class II Division 1 cases. Anchorage type and force direction significantly affected distalization outcomes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Inonu University (TR)
Inönü Üniversitesi
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
6.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.