Narcissists and their influence on firm performance and reporting practices – a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Abstract We synthesize the literature on how narcissism affects organizational outcomes in terms of performance and reporting and provide a future research agenda. A systematic literature review (SLR) is conducted, starting with an initial sample of 35,349 papers. After applying a reproducible selection process, 62 seminal studies in the field of accounting published between 2007 and 2024 are discussed. The literature is structured based on an extended version of upper echelons theory. We find that narcissists are neither exclusively productive nor unproductive for an organization. They can be considered productive in times of crisis and/or growth, or as pioneers in corporate social responsibility (CSR) as they tend to present their company in a positive light and manipulate their (non-)financial reports to do so. However, when manipulation becomes illegal, narcissists become unproductive for a company. The study’s main contribution is a structured map of contemporary knowledge, and a future research agenda pointing to research gaps and potential topics and methods for future research. This holds especially for mechanisms that can restrain the expression of negative aspects of narcissism in organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Review Quarterly
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00538-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narcissists and their influence on firm performance and reporting practices – a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Jennifer Zeppenfeld
3 citations
Management Review Quarterly
Personality Traits and Psychology
6.92
article

Narcissists and their influence on firm performance and reporting practices – a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Jennifer Zeppenfeld
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We synthesize the literature on how narcissism affects organizational outcomes in terms of performance and reporting and provide a future research agenda. A systematic literature review (SLR) is conducted, starting with an initial sample of 35,349 papers. After applying a reproducible selection process, 62 seminal studies in the field of accounting published between 2007 and 2024 are discussed. The literature is structured based on an extended version of upper echelons theory. We find that narcissists are neither exclusively productive nor unproductive for an organization. They can be considered productive in times of crisis and/or growth, or as pioneers in corporate social responsibility (CSR) as they tend to present their company in a positive light and manipulate their (non-)financial reports to do so. However, when manipulation becomes illegal, narcissists become unproductive for a company. The study’s main contribution is a structured map of contemporary knowledge, and a future research agenda pointing to research gaps and potential topics and methods for future research. This holds especially for mechanisms that can restrain the expression of negative aspects of narcissism in organizations.

Management Review Quarterly
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Personality Traits and Psychology
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Narcissists and their influence on firm performance and reporting practices – a systematic literature review and future research agenda — Jennifer Zeppenfeld · Management Review Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS