Philosophy Behind Strategy : Reconstructing the Theoretical Foundation of Strategic Management in a Disruptive Era

Abtract : The era of disruption challenges the relevance of conventional strategic management theories built on assumptions of stability, predictability, and structural rationality. This study aims to identify and examine the philosophical assumptions ontology, epistemology, and axiology underlying mainstream strategic theories, as well as evaluate their limitations in responding to the dynamics of the VUCA world. Objective : As a contribution, this study offers a new, more flexible, and contextual framework to address today's disruptive challenges. Its implications include the redesign of strategic theory and recommendations for more reflective and ethical organizational policies. Methodology : Using a critical conceptual review and philosophical inquiry approach, this study deconstructs the foundational frameworks of theories such as Porter and Mintzberg and proposes an alternative epistemology based on pragmatism. Research results : The findings reveal that the absence of explicit philosophical foundations leads to theoretical fragmentation and weakens the theories' ability to adapt.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61597/jbe-ogzrp.v3i3.114
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philosophy Behind Strategy : Reconstructing the Theoretical Foundation of Strategic Management in a Disruptive Era

Robertus Suraji, Adler Haymans Manurung, Gerson Manurung, Lukman Hakim Sangapan
Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Philosophy Behind Strategy : Reconstructing the Theoretical Foundation of Strategic Management in a Disruptive Era

Robertus Suraji, Adler Haymans Manurung, Gerson Manurung, Lukman Hakim Sangapan
article en

Abstract

Abtract : The era of disruption challenges the relevance of conventional strategic management theories built on assumptions of stability, predictability, and structural rationality. This study aims to identify and examine the philosophical assumptions ontology, epistemology, and axiology underlying mainstream strategic theories, as well as evaluate their limitations in responding to the dynamics of the VUCA world. Objective : As a contribution, this study offers a new, more flexible, and contextual framework to address today's disruptive challenges. Its implications include the redesign of strategic theory and recommendations for more reflective and ethical organizational policies. Methodology : Using a critical conceptual review and philosophical inquiry approach, this study deconstructs the foundational frameworks of theories such as Porter and Mintzberg and proposes an alternative epistemology based on pragmatism. Research results : The findings reveal that the absence of explicit philosophical foundations leads to theoretical fragmentation and weakens the theories' ability to adapt.

Jurnal Bisnis dan EkonomiVol. 3(3)
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.