Energy Markets, Geopolitical Risks, and Global Trade: A High‐Stakes Tug of War

ABSTRACT The ever‐evolving energy landscape and rising geopolitical tensions are reshaping global trade like never before. Trade stability faces significant threats, with crude oil, coal, and natural gas prices fluctuating wildly alongside growing geopolitical uncertainties. This study examines the intricate relationship between energy market swings and geopolitical risks, captured through geopolitical risk acts and threats, to uncover their quantile‐specific impact on global trade dynamics. Using daily data from December 30, 2016, to January 13, 2025, we apply Multivariate Quantile‐on‐Quantile Regression and Quantile Regression to dissect how these forces influence trade across different levels. Our findings reveal that crude oil remains the dominant driver of global trade, with its influence intensifying at higher trade quantiles. Meanwhile, coal and natural gas exhibit varying impacts and geopolitical risk acts unexpectedly boost trade in high‐quantile scenarios, whereas geopolitical risk threats consistently dampen trade flows. These insights shed light on the dual nature of energy markets and geopolitical risks as catalysts and disruptors of global trade. To navigate these turbulent waters, we advocate for energy diversification, proactive geopolitical risk management, and integrating green energy policies to stabilise trade flows and bolster economic resilience amid growing uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Journal
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.70026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Markets, Geopolitical Risks, and Global Trade: A High‐Stakes Tug of War

Oktay Özkan, Seyi Saint Akadırı
3 citations
Geological Journal
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
article

Energy Markets, Geopolitical Risks, and Global Trade: A High‐Stakes Tug of War

Oktay Özkan, Seyi Saint Akadırı
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ever‐evolving energy landscape and rising geopolitical tensions are reshaping global trade like never before. Trade stability faces significant threats, with crude oil, coal, and natural gas prices fluctuating wildly alongside growing geopolitical uncertainties. This study examines the intricate relationship between energy market swings and geopolitical risks, captured through geopolitical risk acts and threats, to uncover their quantile‐specific impact on global trade dynamics. Using daily data from December 30, 2016, to January 13, 2025, we apply Multivariate Quantile‐on‐Quantile Regression and Quantile Regression to dissect how these forces influence trade across different levels. Our findings reveal that crude oil remains the dominant driver of global trade, with its influence intensifying at higher trade quantiles. Meanwhile, coal and natural gas exhibit varying impacts and geopolitical risk acts unexpectedly boost trade in high‐quantile scenarios, whereas geopolitical risk threats consistently dampen trade flows. These insights shed light on the dual nature of energy markets and geopolitical risks as catalysts and disruptors of global trade. To navigate these turbulent waters, we advocate for energy diversification, proactive geopolitical risk management, and integrating green energy policies to stabilise trade flows and bolster economic resilience amid growing uncertainties.

Geological Journal
European University of Lefke (TR), Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.