Predictive modeling and machine learning show poor performance of clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic parameters for small intracranial aneurysm rupture

Small intracranial aneurysms (SIAs) (< 5 mm) are increasingly detected due to advanced imaging, but predicting rupture risk remains challenging. Rupture, though rare, can cause devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage. This study analyzed 141 SIAs (101 unruptured, 40 ruptured) using semi-automatic morphological analysis and high-resolution, image-based blood flow simulations from 3D rotational angiography. Advanced morphological and hemodynamic parameters were extracted, with clustering applied to address multicollinearity. Univariate logistic regression identified cluster representatives, and forward selection highlighted the maximum height, Neck inflow rate, and Non-sphericity index as rupture predictors, though only the latter two were significant. Clinical variables like age, sex, and comorbidities were also assessed but failed to predict rupture risk. The full model showed overfitting, with a pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> of 0.142 on the training set but only 0.032 on the test set. A simplified model using just Neck inflow rate and Non-sphericity index performed similarly poorly (pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> of 0.034). Multiple machine learning classifiers were evaluated, with similar performance across models, supporting the model-independence of the results. Overall, neither morphological, hemodynamic, nor clinical variables reliably predicted rupture risk, highlighting the limitations of current methods and underscoring the need for prospective studies and multimodal approaches that integrate imaging biomarkers and compare small and large aneurysms for better risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08478-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive modeling and machine learning show poor performance of clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic parameters for small intracranial aneurysm rupture

A.M. Rashidi, Samuel Voß, I. Erol Sandalcioglu, Daniel Behme et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
2.78
article

Predictive modeling and machine learning show poor performance of clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic parameters for small intracranial aneurysm rupture

A.M. Rashidi, Samuel Voß, I. Erol Sandalcioglu, Daniel Behme, Klaus‐Peter Stein, Igor Fischer, Vanessa M. Swiatek, Philipp Berg, Florian Sprenger, Belal Neyazi, Roland Schwab, Hafez Kader, Sylvia Saalfeld
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Small intracranial aneurysms (SIAs) (< 5 mm) are increasingly detected due to advanced imaging, but predicting rupture risk remains challenging. Rupture, though rare, can cause devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage. This study analyzed 141 SIAs (101 unruptured, 40 ruptured) using semi-automatic morphological analysis and high-resolution, image-based blood flow simulations from 3D rotational angiography. Advanced morphological and hemodynamic parameters were extracted, with clustering applied to address multicollinearity. Univariate logistic regression identified cluster representatives, and forward selection highlighted the maximum height, Neck inflow rate, and Non-sphericity index as rupture predictors, though only the latter two were significant. Clinical variables like age, sex, and comorbidities were also assessed but failed to predict rupture risk. The full model showed overfitting, with a pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> of 0.142 on the training set but only 0.032 on the test set. A simplified model using just Neck inflow rate and Non-sphericity index performed similarly poorly (pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> of 0.034). Multiple machine learning classifiers were evaluated, with similar performance across models, supporting the model-independence of the results. Overall, neither morphological, hemodynamic, nor clinical variables reliably predicted rupture risk, highlighting the limitations of current methods and underscoring the need for prospective studies and multimodal approaches that integrate imaging biomarkers and compare small and large aneurysms for better risk stratification.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Experimental Factory Magdeburg (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Lübeck (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.