Estimating the use of biological samples in Finnish biobanks and hospital collections

Finland has steadily developed its biobanking infrastructures since the early 2010s. This article presents a systematic overview of the number of biological samples that have been provided for research since 2013 when the Finnish Biobank Act came into force. Using data from individual biobanks and from permits issued by Fimea (formerly Valvira), we present the most up-to-date and complete account of sample use at a national level. Between 2014 and 2023 a total of 1,474,881 samples were provided through 998 sample requests. A better understanding of the use of biological samples at the national level can help highlight the important impact biobanking has as an infrastructure for supporting research. We argue that developing standards can help in developing national biobanking strategies and identify areas where biobanking can be further developed. We also conclude that the ability to combine tissue samples and health data flexibly and efficiently is essential and needs to be secured also within the context of the European Health Data Space (EHDS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01906-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the use of biological samples in Finnish biobanks and hospital collections

Sanna Siltanen, Merja Perälä, Aaro Tupasela, Tiina Vesterinen et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Human Genetics
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
article

Estimating the use of biological samples in Finnish biobanks and hospital collections

Sanna Siltanen, Merja Perälä, Aaro Tupasela, Tiina Vesterinen, Theresa Knopp, Tiina Jokela, Anne‐Mari Moilanen, Kimmo Pitkänen, Mika Kontro, Raisa Serpi, Leena E. Viiri, Enni Makkonen, Tom Southerington, Minna Ruddock, Lila Kallio, Johanna Mäkelä, Eero Punkka, Veli-Matti Kosma, Arto Mannermaa, Päivi Ingalsuo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Finland has steadily developed its biobanking infrastructures since the early 2010s. This article presents a systematic overview of the number of biological samples that have been provided for research since 2013 when the Finnish Biobank Act came into force. Using data from individual biobanks and from permits issued by Fimea (formerly Valvira), we present the most up-to-date and complete account of sample use at a national level. Between 2014 and 2023 a total of 1,474,881 samples were provided through 998 sample requests. A better understanding of the use of biological samples at the national level can help highlight the important impact biobanking has as an infrastructure for supporting research. We argue that developing standards can help in developing national biobanking strategies and identify areas where biobanking can be further developed. We also conclude that the ability to combine tissue samples and health data flexibly and efficiently is essential and needs to be secured also within the context of the European Health Data Space (EHDS).

European Journal of Human GeneticsVol. 33(11)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Finnish Red Cross (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Finnish Cancer Registry (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District (FI), Tampere University (FI), Central Finland Health Care District (FI), Turku Centre for Biotechnology (FI), South Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences (FI), Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, Strategic Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.