Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on Nobel active implant impressions: An original study

Accurate implant impressions are essential for the success and longevity of implant-supported prostheses. The Nobel Active system has a tapered body and aggressive thread design, demanding high precision. Therefore, it is of interest to compare open-tray and closed-tray techniques for impression accuracy. Implants were placed at 0°, 15°, and 25° angulations for evaluation. A Coordinate Measuring Machine was used for 3D deviation measurements. At 0°, both techniques showed negligible differences in accuracy. At 15° and 25°, the open-tray technique had significantly better accuracy (p < 0.05). Impression errors increased with implant angulation, mainly in closed-tray groups. Angulated implants posed greater challenges for accurate impressions. Thus, we show the role of angulation in impression precision. Open-tray techniques are preferred in angulated Nobel Active implant cases. This approach enhances prosthetic fit and improves clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211191
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on Nobel active implant impressions: An original study

T Jyothi, G S Prasanthi, Neha Agrawal, Uppala Sushma et al.
Bioinformation
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on Nobel active implant impressions: An original study

T Jyothi, G S Prasanthi, Neha Agrawal, Uppala Sushma, Varchaswi Vellanki, Raguri Manaswi
article en

Abstract

Accurate implant impressions are essential for the success and longevity of implant-supported prostheses. The Nobel Active system has a tapered body and aggressive thread design, demanding high precision. Therefore, it is of interest to compare open-tray and closed-tray techniques for impression accuracy. Implants were placed at 0°, 15°, and 25° angulations for evaluation. A Coordinate Measuring Machine was used for 3D deviation measurements. At 0°, both techniques showed negligible differences in accuracy. At 15° and 25°, the open-tray technique had significantly better accuracy (p < 0.05). Impression errors increased with implant angulation, mainly in closed-tray groups. Angulated implants posed greater challenges for accurate impressions. Thus, we show the role of angulation in impression precision. Open-tray techniques are preferred in angulated Nobel Active implant cases. This approach enhances prosthetic fit and improves clinical outcomes.

BioinformationVol. 21(05)
Index Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre (IN), Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.