Women’s and girls’ sexual empowerment differs by geographical context: a population-based validation study

To validate a sexual empowerment sub-scale of the Women’s and Girls’ Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Index (WGE-SRH) across eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, and compare sexual empowerment across these contexts. This study leverages cross-sectional, population-based survey data collected among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso (n = 4,012), Côte d’Ivoire (n = 2,278); Kongo Central, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC (n = 1,097)); Kinshasa, DRC (n = 1,143); Rajasthan, India (n = 4,004); Kenya (n = 5,454); Kano, Nigeria (n = 780); Lagos, Nigeria (n = 804); Niger (n = 2,286); and Uganda (n = 2,228) to validate eight sexual empowerment measures via confirmatory factor analysis. Overall scores of the validated measures were descriptively examined across settings. Final models confirm the theoretical structure of the sexual empowerment measure, including two- dimensions: “existence of choice” and “exercise of choice”, each comprised of three items, with moderate internal consistency ranging from 0.59 to 0.69. Factor loadings, goodness-of-fit, and percent agreement varied in Rajasthan, India compared to sub-Saharan African settings. Marked variations were seen across sites in women’s perceptions of their partners’ responses to refusing sex, as well as their own confidence in voicing when and when not to have sex. This measure was developed in sub-Saharan Africa and works well for the population that it was designed to serve, however, cannot be extrapolated to other settings. To comprehensively capture the dynamic nature of sexual empowerment, future research is needed to examine measures across cultures and time. Validation across diverse settings opens avenues for holistic examination of positive sexual health, including factors that enhance women’s sexual empowerment and rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03874-1
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women’s and girls’ sexual empowerment differs by geographical context: a population-based validation study

Caroline Moreau, Frederick Makumbi, Simon P. S. Kibira, Anoop Khanna et al.
2 links
BMC Women s Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Women’s and girls’ sexual empowerment differs by geographical context: a population-based validation study

Caroline Moreau, Frederick Makumbi, Simon P. S. Kibira, Anoop Khanna, Pierre Z Akilimali, Celia Karp, Shannon N. Wood, Peter Gichangi, Georges Guiella, Funmilola M. OlaOlorun, Jessica L. Dozier, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Sani Oumarou, Rosine Mosso
article en

Abstract

To validate a sexual empowerment sub-scale of the Women’s and Girls’ Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Index (WGE-SRH) across eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, and compare sexual empowerment across these contexts. This study leverages cross-sectional, population-based survey data collected among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso (n = 4,012), Côte d’Ivoire (n = 2,278); Kongo Central, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC (n = 1,097)); Kinshasa, DRC (n = 1,143); Rajasthan, India (n = 4,004); Kenya (n = 5,454); Kano, Nigeria (n = 780); Lagos, Nigeria (n = 804); Niger (n = 2,286); and Uganda (n = 2,228) to validate eight sexual empowerment measures via confirmatory factor analysis. Overall scores of the validated measures were descriptively examined across settings. Final models confirm the theoretical structure of the sexual empowerment measure, including two- dimensions: “existence of choice” and “exercise of choice”, each comprised of three items, with moderate internal consistency ranging from 0.59 to 0.69. Factor loadings, goodness-of-fit, and percent agreement varied in Rajasthan, India compared to sub-Saharan African settings. Marked variations were seen across sites in women’s perceptions of their partners’ responses to refusing sex, as well as their own confidence in voicing when and when not to have sex. This measure was developed in sub-Saharan Africa and works well for the population that it was designed to serve, however, cannot be extrapolated to other settings. To comprehensively capture the dynamic nature of sexual empowerment, future research is needed to examine measures across cultures and time. Validation across diverse settings opens avenues for holistic examination of positive sexual health, including factors that enhance women’s sexual empowerment and rights.

BMC Women s HealthVol. 25(1)
Ministry of Public Health (CD), Johns Hopkins University (US), Inserm (FR), University of Ibadan (NG), Technical University of Mombasa (KE), Ghent University (BE), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Institut Superieur Des Sciences De La Population (BF), Institut National de la Statistique (MG), International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya (KE), Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IN), Makerere University (UG), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.