Achieving equitable access to health technologies during a pandemic: Lessons learned from UK universities’ technology transfer practices & policies 2019–2023

The COVID-19 pandemic underlined stark inequalities in timely access to health technologies worldwide. Universities, by conducting a significant amount of early biomedical research and development, have a critical but often overlooked role in determining downstream equitable access to health technologies. This paper reviews university's policies and practices regarding COVID-19 health technologies in the United Kingdom (UK) during the recent pandemic using annual freedom of Information (FOI) requests between 2019 and 2023 to a cohort of 35 UK universities and website searches. We provide an overview of all patents and licenses filed for COVID-19 technologies, changes in technology transfer policies or strategies, and engagement with international mechanisms designed to enhance equitable transfer of knowledge and intellectual property rights during the pandemic. Despite a time-limited increase in non-exclusive licensing of COVID-19 health technologies at the height of the pandemic, there was a lack of systemic change in university policies for technology transfer, and limited to no engagement with international mechanisms to promote equitable access. Universities can promote global equitable access to health technologies by publishing clear technology transfer policies, attaching conditions to technology transfer agreements, increasing transparency, and engaging with non-exclusive licensing mechanisms, now and in future health emergencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Health
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2528072
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving equitable access to health technologies during a pandemic: Lessons learned from UK universities’ technology transfer practices & policies 2019–2023

Molly Pugh-Jones, Rachel McCormick, Rebecca Hotchkin, Sarai Keestra et al.
Global Public Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Achieving equitable access to health technologies during a pandemic: Lessons learned from UK universities’ technology transfer practices & policies 2019–2023

Molly Pugh-Jones, Rachel McCormick, Rebecca Hotchkin, Sarai Keestra, Ayolola Eni‐Olotu
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underlined stark inequalities in timely access to health technologies worldwide. Universities, by conducting a significant amount of early biomedical research and development, have a critical but often overlooked role in determining downstream equitable access to health technologies. This paper reviews university's policies and practices regarding COVID-19 health technologies in the United Kingdom (UK) during the recent pandemic using annual freedom of Information (FOI) requests between 2019 and 2023 to a cohort of 35 UK universities and website searches. We provide an overview of all patents and licenses filed for COVID-19 technologies, changes in technology transfer policies or strategies, and engagement with international mechanisms designed to enhance equitable transfer of knowledge and intellectual property rights during the pandemic. Despite a time-limited increase in non-exclusive licensing of COVID-19 health technologies at the height of the pandemic, there was a lack of systemic change in university policies for technology transfer, and limited to no engagement with international mechanisms to promote equitable access. Universities can promote global equitable access to health technologies by publishing clear technology transfer policies, attaching conditions to technology transfer agreements, increasing transparency, and engaging with non-exclusive licensing mechanisms, now and in future health emergencies.

Global Public HealthVol. 20(1)
King's College London (GB), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.