Common cervicovaginal sequencing methods result in discordant molecular diagnoses of bacterial vaginosis and reveal strain level effects of Gardnerella vaginalis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with HIV transmission and pre-term birth, yet the etiology of BV remains unknown. Our analysis addressed that knowledge gap by comparing diagnostic techniques and using Bayesian inference to find species-specific associations with clinical indicators. We also assessed the effect of sequencing methodology on the results of molecular BV profiling. We observed significant differences in microbial diversity within BV-associated CSTs based on clinical diagnosis. CST assignments were substantially influenced by sequencing methodology, with concordance between methods as low as 59% for metatranscriptomic and metataxonomic-based CST assignment. We also found that <i>Gardnerella</i> has a strain-dependent association with individual Amsel's criteria, and that <i>Dialister micraerophilus</i> and <i>Parvimonas micra</i> are positively associated with Amsel's criteria while <i>Lactobacillus</i> is negatively associated. These results highlight the challenge of characterizing a condition without a single etiological agent, reinforcing the need for more granular diagnoses and treatments that are sensitive to BV variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Women s Health
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44294-025-00089-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common cervicovaginal sequencing methods result in discordant molecular diagnoses of bacterial vaginosis and reveal strain level effects of Gardnerella vaginalis

María L. Alcaide, Ana S. Salazar, Nicholas Fonseca Nogueira, Patricia Raccamarich et al.
2 citations
npj Women s Health
Reproductive tract infections research
2.37
article

Common cervicovaginal sequencing methods result in discordant molecular diagnoses of bacterial vaginosis and reveal strain level effects of Gardnerella vaginalis

María L. Alcaide, Ana S. Salazar, Nicholas Fonseca Nogueira, Patricia Raccamarich, Lydia A. Fein, Michael Gale, Courtney A. Broedlow, Johanna B. Holm, L. Acosta, Jacques Ravel, Nichole R. Klatt, Yue Pan, Emily M. Cherenack, Michael France, E. R. Swanson, Ashma Chakrawarti, Chris Basting
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with HIV transmission and pre-term birth, yet the etiology of BV remains unknown. Our analysis addressed that knowledge gap by comparing diagnostic techniques and using Bayesian inference to find species-specific associations with clinical indicators. We also assessed the effect of sequencing methodology on the results of molecular BV profiling. We observed significant differences in microbial diversity within BV-associated CSTs based on clinical diagnosis. CST assignments were substantially influenced by sequencing methodology, with concordance between methods as low as 59% for metatranscriptomic and metataxonomic-based CST assignment. We also found that <i>Gardnerella</i> has a strain-dependent association with individual Amsel's criteria, and that <i>Dialister micraerophilus</i> and <i>Parvimonas micra</i> are positively associated with Amsel's criteria while <i>Lactobacillus</i> is negatively associated. These results highlight the challenge of characterizing a condition without a single etiological agent, reinforcing the need for more granular diagnoses and treatments that are sensitive to BV variability.

npj Women s HealthVol. 3(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Miami (US), University of Washington (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Reproductive tract infections research
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.