Robust PINN modeling via sensitivity-based adaptive sampling: Integration of optimal sensor placement and structural uncertainty handling

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as promising surrogate models for systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their practical implementation faces challenges in training efficiency and robustness to uncertainties. This study refines and improves a recently proposed sensitivity-based adaptive sampling (SBS) methodology to address these challenges specifically for twice-differentiable PDE systems. We first conduct a systematic investigation of SBS hyper-parameters, including prediction horizon and adaptation rate, revealing their crucial role in training performance. To enhance PINN model robustness facing uncertainties, we propose two approaches: (1) incorporating sensor measurements at sensitivity-identified locations into the loss function, and (2) augmenting the PINN architecture with direct sensor data inputs. Results show that our proposed approaches achieve superior generalization capabilities and robustness. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the SBS methodology can serve for optimal sensor placement by identifying locations that maximize information gain for model training. • A method is proposed for enhancing PINN training via optimal location of sampling points. • Small prediction horizons and conservative adaptation rates optimize performance. • Direct sensor data input improves PINN robustness over loss function modifications. • The proposed framework enables optimal sensor placement by identifying high-information zones. • Inlet velocity input enables PINN generalization to unseen flow conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Process Control
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2025.103493
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust PINN modeling via sensitivity-based adaptive sampling: Integration of optimal sensor placement and structural uncertainty handling

Chris McCready, Piyush Agarwal, Luis Ricardez‐Sandoval, Hector Budman et al.
3 citations
Journal of Process Control
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
4.20
article

Robust PINN modeling via sensitivity-based adaptive sampling: Integration of optimal sensor placement and structural uncertainty handling

Chris McCready, Piyush Agarwal, Luis Ricardez‐Sandoval, Hector Budman, S. Chang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as promising surrogate models for systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their practical implementation faces challenges in training efficiency and robustness to uncertainties. This study refines and improves a recently proposed sensitivity-based adaptive sampling (SBS) methodology to address these challenges specifically for twice-differentiable PDE systems. We first conduct a systematic investigation of SBS hyper-parameters, including prediction horizon and adaptation rate, revealing their crucial role in training performance. To enhance PINN model robustness facing uncertainties, we propose two approaches: (1) incorporating sensor measurements at sensitivity-identified locations into the loss function, and (2) augmenting the PINN architecture with direct sensor data inputs. Results show that our proposed approaches achieve superior generalization capabilities and robustness. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the SBS methodology can serve for optimal sensor placement by identifying locations that maximize information gain for model training. • A method is proposed for enhancing PINN training via optimal location of sampling points. • Small prediction horizons and conservative adaptation rates optimize performance. • Direct sensor data input improves PINN robustness over loss function modifications. • The proposed framework enables optimal sensor placement by identifying high-information zones. • Inlet velocity input enables PINN generalization to unseen flow conditions.

Journal of Process ControlVol. 152
University of Waterloo (CA), Sartorius (United Kingdom) (GB), Pfizer (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.