Powering fairness in climate adaptation capabilities: Evaluating the influence of air conditioning rebates in a hot climate

Assisting households with maintaining adequate energy supply is one method for improving overall quality of life. Households experiencing energy insecurity may be unable to afford to use energy for necessary services at home (e.g., unable to purchase air conditioners). Energy efficiency (EE) can reduce energy costs for low-income households–requiring less energy for essential activities. While existing research has identified the groups that are less likely to participate in energy efficiency programs, there is limited research on how participation impacts energy insecurity among vulnerable households when they participate. Using over 138,000 households in Tallahassee, Florida we study participants in a neighborhood program that targeted underserved communities. We conduct quasi-experimental difference-in-difference comparisons for seasonal energy consumption, energy bills, and energy burden during the cooling season in response to air conditioning (AC) appliance purchases. We compare impacts for households in the program (REACH) and higher income non-REACH qualified households. We find that REACH homes, on average, save approximately 300kWh-eq on energy or $25 seasonally after purchasing an AC unit. While AC rebates reduce seasonal energy burden by 0.6 % in non-REACH homes, there is no statistically significant change in seasonal energy burden for REACH homes. The difference in energy reduction between REACH and non-REACH qualified homes could be due to increases in AC use among REACH homes after rebates. Further work could explore this trend of potential increases in efficient appliance use among low-income homes. • Air conditioning rebates impact low-income homes in a hot climate during cooling seasons. • Low-income homes save $25 on energy bills each cooling season due to rebates. • Higher-income homes, on average, save $6 more per cooling season after rebates. • Low-income homes may have increased AC use because of AC rebates. • This study shows how energy efficiency helps low-income homes afford energy needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104204
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Powering fairness in climate adaptation capabilities: Evaluating the influence of air conditioning rebates in a hot climate

Destenie Nock, Kester Wade, Xue Gao
4 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.45
article

Powering fairness in climate adaptation capabilities: Evaluating the influence of air conditioning rebates in a hot climate

Destenie Nock, Kester Wade, Xue Gao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Assisting households with maintaining adequate energy supply is one method for improving overall quality of life. Households experiencing energy insecurity may be unable to afford to use energy for necessary services at home (e.g., unable to purchase air conditioners). Energy efficiency (EE) can reduce energy costs for low-income households–requiring less energy for essential activities. While existing research has identified the groups that are less likely to participate in energy efficiency programs, there is limited research on how participation impacts energy insecurity among vulnerable households when they participate. Using over 138,000 households in Tallahassee, Florida we study participants in a neighborhood program that targeted underserved communities. We conduct quasi-experimental difference-in-difference comparisons for seasonal energy consumption, energy bills, and energy burden during the cooling season in response to air conditioning (AC) appliance purchases. We compare impacts for households in the program (REACH) and higher income non-REACH qualified households. We find that REACH homes, on average, save approximately 300kWh-eq on energy or $25 seasonally after purchasing an AC unit. While AC rebates reduce seasonal energy burden by 0.6 % in non-REACH homes, there is no statistically significant change in seasonal energy burden for REACH homes. The difference in energy reduction between REACH and non-REACH qualified homes could be due to increases in AC use among REACH homes after rebates. Further work could explore this trend of potential increases in efficient appliance use among low-income homes. • Air conditioning rebates impact low-income homes in a hot climate during cooling seasons. • Low-income homes save $25 on energy bills each cooling season due to rebates. • Higher-income homes, on average, save $6 more per cooling season after rebates. • Low-income homes may have increased AC use because of AC rebates. • This study shows how energy efficiency helps low-income homes afford energy needs.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 127
Florida State University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.