An extended CoCoSo method under (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications

The management of health care waste (HCW) is a major environmental and public health challenge, especially in developing nations. A complex multi-criteria decision analysis problem encompassing both qualitative and quantitative aspects is the choice of the best technology for HCW disposal. It is possible to evaluate HCW treatment technologies using ambiguous or inaccurate data. Furthermore, the majority of current HCW decision models are unable to account for these intricate interactions. The (p-q) rung orthopair fuzzy set is integrated in this research to present a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model. Due to the greater range of their membership grades, (p-q) rung orthopair fuzzy sets can offer more ambiguous scenarios than Fermatean, Pythagorean, and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. We first develop basic operational criteria to characterize some aggregation operators (AOs) under Sugeno-Weber operations, comprising the Sugeno-Weber weighted averaging operator for (p-q) rung orthopairs ((p-q) ROFSWWA). We investigate these operators' basic characteristics in further detail. To determine the ranking of alternatives, an enhanced combination compromise solution approach is suggested in this study. We provide a case study on HCW management selection to demonstrate the usefulness of our suggested approach. Comparing our suggested decision-making procedure to current MCDM techniques demonstrates its high efficacy and dependability in evaluating and rating HCW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06020-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An extended CoCoSo method under (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications

Sher Afzal Khan, Ali Muhammad Ali Rushdi, Omar Barukab, Umair Ahmad et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
article

An extended CoCoSo method under (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications

Sher Afzal Khan, Ali Muhammad Ali Rushdi, Omar Barukab, Umair Ahmad, Asghar Khan, Young Bae Jun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The management of health care waste (HCW) is a major environmental and public health challenge, especially in developing nations. A complex multi-criteria decision analysis problem encompassing both qualitative and quantitative aspects is the choice of the best technology for HCW disposal. It is possible to evaluate HCW treatment technologies using ambiguous or inaccurate data. Furthermore, the majority of current HCW decision models are unable to account for these intricate interactions. The (p-q) rung orthopair fuzzy set is integrated in this research to present a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model. Due to the greater range of their membership grades, (p-q) rung orthopair fuzzy sets can offer more ambiguous scenarios than Fermatean, Pythagorean, and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. We first develop basic operational criteria to characterize some aggregation operators (AOs) under Sugeno-Weber operations, comprising the Sugeno-Weber weighted averaging operator for (p-q) rung orthopairs ((p-q) ROFSWWA). We investigate these operators' basic characteristics in further detail. To determine the ranking of alternatives, an enhanced combination compromise solution approach is suggested in this study. We provide a case study on HCW management selection to demonstrate the usefulness of our suggested approach. Comparing our suggested decision-making procedure to current MCDM techniques demonstrates its high efficacy and dependability in evaluating and rating HCW.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (PK), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Gyeongsang National University (KR)
King Abdulaziz University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.