Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms

As Educational Technology (EdTech) platforms become increasingly integrated into higher education, concerns arise regarding the use of deceptive patterns-manipulative UX/UI strategies that influence user decisions.This study systematically examines deceptive patterns across Learning Management Systems (LMS), Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), new media platforms, and AI-driven learning tools.Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a survey with 12 university students and 6 educators to analyze their experiences and awareness of deceptive practices.Findings reveal that LMS platforms are trusted but lack flexibility, MOOCs often employ deceptive pricing strategies, new media platforms leverage algorithm-driven engagement tactics, and AI tools raise concerns about academic integrity.These insights highlight the tension between personalization and user protection, emphasizing the need for transparent and ethical EdTech design.This study contributes to UX regulation discussions and provides recommendations for balancing user engagement, accessibility, and fairness in digital learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3736370
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms

Muyuan Liu, Anne Roudaut, Eszter Vigh
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms

Muyuan Liu, Anne Roudaut, Eszter Vigh
article en

Abstract

As Educational Technology (EdTech) platforms become increasingly integrated into higher education, concerns arise regarding the use of deceptive patterns-manipulative UX/UI strategies that influence user decisions.This study systematically examines deceptive patterns across Learning Management Systems (LMS), Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), new media platforms, and AI-driven learning tools.Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a survey with 12 university students and 6 educators to analyze their experiences and awareness of deceptive practices.Findings reveal that LMS platforms are trusted but lack flexibility, MOOCs often employ deceptive pricing strategies, new media platforms leverage algorithm-driven engagement tactics, and AI tools raise concerns about academic integrity.These insights highlight the tension between personalization and user protection, emphasizing the need for transparent and ethical EdTech design.This study contributes to UX regulation discussions and provides recommendations for balancing user engagement, accessibility, and fairness in digital learning environments.

University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms — Muyuan Liu, Anne Roudaut, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS