Designing Interactions for Artificial Commensal Companions

Eating with others offers several health and social benefits, which could potentially be preserved through the use of robotic companions when dining with another person is not an option. This study examined enjoyment of interaction, social connection, desired features, and concerns regarding a lunchtime commensal interaction between a human and a social robot. Participants were asked to eat lunch, unexpectedly accompanied by a NAO robot capable of conversing with them, and to participate in a qualitative study afterward. Twenty-two users took part in interviews focused on their experience with a robot and their thoughts on the ideal functionalities an artificial commensal companion should have. Users unanimously enjoyed the interaction, and stated that they would prefer eating with a robot to eating alone. They also suggested novel applications and specific improvements, including stronger personalization and the ability to discuss personal topics and interests as well as show empathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3736351
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Interactions for Artificial Commensal Companions

Maurizio Mancini, H K Fong, Selim Soufargi, Radosław Niewiadomski
1 citations
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
article

Designing Interactions for Artificial Commensal Companions

Maurizio Mancini, H K Fong, Selim Soufargi, Radosław Niewiadomski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Eating with others offers several health and social benefits, which could potentially be preserved through the use of robotic companions when dining with another person is not an option. This study examined enjoyment of interaction, social connection, desired features, and concerns regarding a lunchtime commensal interaction between a human and a social robot. Participants were asked to eat lunch, unexpectedly accompanied by a NAO robot capable of conversing with them, and to participate in a qualitative study afterward. Twenty-two users took part in interviews focused on their experience with a robot and their thoughts on the ideal functionalities an artificial commensal companion should have. Users unanimously enjoyed the interaction, and stated that they would prefer eating with a robot to eating alone. They also suggested novel applications and specific improvements, including stronger personalization and the ability to discuss personal topics and interests as well as show empathy.

University of Genoa (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Designing Interactions for Artificial Commensal Companions — Maurizio Mancini, H K Fong, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS