Towards Key Contributing Factors in Identifying Dark Pattern Autonomy Violations under the EU Digital Services Act

Dark patterns refer to design practices which undermine users’ ability to make autonomous and informed choices in relation to digital systems. The recent EU Digital Services Act (DSA) aims to protect users from such dark patterns and their effects. DSA Article 25 prohibits three autonomy violation types: deception, manipulation and distortion/impairment. However, for regulation of dark patterns, it is important to reason about why an observed design practice constitutes a particular autonomy violation type, to show that it indeed violates the DSA. In this work-in-progress, two experts (with HCI, CS and legal background) mapped 59 known dark patterns onto these three autonomy violation types. We then analysed our rationale for this mapping to identify eight design factors which can help determine the dark pattern autonomy violation(s). Our analysis aims to situate existing dark patterns knowledge within the DSA legal framework, to support regulation and compliance of such design practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3736336
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Key Contributing Factors in Identifying Dark Pattern Autonomy Violations under the EU Digital Services Act

Sanju Ahuja, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Santos, Johanna Gunawan
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Towards Key Contributing Factors in Identifying Dark Pattern Autonomy Violations under the EU Digital Services Act

Sanju Ahuja, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Santos, Johanna Gunawan
article en

Abstract

Dark patterns refer to design practices which undermine users’ ability to make autonomous and informed choices in relation to digital systems. The recent EU Digital Services Act (DSA) aims to protect users from such dark patterns and their effects. DSA Article 25 prohibits three autonomy violation types: deception, manipulation and distortion/impairment. However, for regulation of dark patterns, it is important to reason about why an observed design practice constitutes a particular autonomy violation type, to show that it indeed violates the DSA. In this work-in-progress, two experts (with HCI, CS and legal background) mapped 59 known dark patterns onto these three autonomy violation types. We then analysed our rationale for this mapping to identify eight design factors which can help determine the dark pattern autonomy violation(s). Our analysis aims to situate existing dark patterns knowledge within the DSA legal framework, to support regulation and compliance of such design practices.

Utrecht University (NL), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Maastricht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.